Connect with us
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

Committee rejects Ocky White sale price

Published

on

COUNCILLORS have overwhelmingly stated they feel the sale price of £460,000 for the Ocky White building in Haverfordwest does not represent good value for money.

When it was agreed at a meeting of the Cabinet in September that the Council should go ahead with acquiring the building many people were left angry at the decision.

Three days later after that meeting, Cllrs Jacob Williams, Mike Stoddart, Viv Stoddart, Mike Evans, Pearl Llewellyn and Phil Kidney called in Cabinet’s decision saying it was poor value for taxpayers money and that it does not present the full financial picture.

The matter was then brought to an extraordinary meeting of the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee held on Friday, September 28.

Before discussion took place members were presented with an option of discussing the matter in open session or in private as two documents had been classed as restricted.

Cllr Phil Kidney said he was ‘very keen’ for the matter to be held in open session as it was a ‘very large amount of money’.

The Councils’ Head of Legal Services Claire Incledon told members that the parties involved had asked for the documents to be restricted.

Cllr Jamie Adams said they had to respect those wishes and proposed that the meeting be held in open session and go into private session to discuss the restricted document if necessary. That was approved unanimously.

Cllr Jacob Williams said there hadn’t been much scrutiny at Cabinet and said it represented poor value to taxpayers. He also said that the price agreed of £460,000 was ‘vastly over the top’ and described it as ‘scandalous’.

He added: “The significance of the building is overhyped. It has a listed building as an annex and we would be rewarding a property owner of a not particularly attractive building with taxpayers’ money.

“I have not yet seen a positive public comment on this proposal. People say this will be a waste of millions of pounds, the purchase price is too high and there is a lot of resentment to the council spending £460,000 on the back of the 12.5% hike in council tax.

“People have said to me the price agreed is way too high, that it has been up for sale and attracted no interest and that it is worth a maximum of £100,000.”

Cllr Mike Stoddart added: “We are offering £460,000 spending £3m on it and ending up with asset of £750,000, even with the Welsh Government loan it is still a bad deal.”

Cllr Viv Stoddart explained that at a meeting of the strategic asset management group in July there were serious concerns that the figures didn’t stack up and called for the Cabinet to look at this again.

Cllr Mike Evans said that other than this committee they had no involvement in this decision and said once the building was purchased the rates on an empty building would be the councils to pick up. He also said there had been no interest in other buildings in the town and that rents in Haverfordwest had ‘fallen through the floor’.

Cllr Pearl Llewellyn said she had listened to people in her ward who were complaining about vacant buildings in Pembroke such as South Quay and added they had said it was nice to see that some councillors have had the balls to call this in.

Cabinet member Cllr Paul Miller said they had given much greater priority to supporting economy in Pembrokeshire and that the aspiration for Haverfordwest was much wider than this one building.

He added: “The acquisition of Ocky White shouldn’t be viewed in isolation, it is the proposed first step in future for Haverfordwest. The grant award is based on refurbishment and this is the option we have pursued so far.

“We need to buy this building to demonstrate our commitment to the wholesale plan for the redevelopment of the town centre.”

Cllr Jamie Adams said although the scheme had been in the offing for a long time he could not support the decision to invest in the building saying ‘it is incompatible with financial demands’.

Cllr Stephen Joseph said it did not make sense and said he couldn’t back it as it is ‘fundamentally flawed’ adding it was ‘bonkers’ at a time when everyone is feeling the pinch.

Cllr Di Clements added: “Just because Welsh Government money is available it doesn’t me we should go chasing it. This is taxpayers money, I am not sold on this and demolition is probably the way to go.”

She later added that they were being asked to make a ‘huge leap of faith’ as they did not know the final costs or if the building would be occupied.

Cllr Brian Hall said it was a ‘total waste of money’ while Cllr Tony Wilcox suggested the council should get another independent valuation on the building before having another long hard look at it.

Cllr David Pugh said: “Retailing has changed dramatically, just basing it on retail is not going to work. Business rents have dropped dramatically and there just isn’t the demand for it, I do sympathise, it is a huge problem and there isn’t an easy fix. Something needs to be done or we will just end up with another shambles.

“The revenue implications are huge and I really struggle to make sense of this acquisition, the price is far too high, it is not worth a penny and I can’t support spending £460,000 for a building where we don’t know what we’re going to find.”

Haverfordwest Cllr Tim Evans said a lot of these things should have been done 30 years ago but did not support the sale going ahead at the price mentioned.

Head of property Barry Cooke said he would not buy the building at that price saying it was too high but added that the owners won’t sell for anything less than that. “If we can’t acquire the property we will not able to proceed with first step. It is a difficult building to value but we did get them down to £450,000 but they have quoted more than that,” he added.

Cllr Williams went on to ask questions of where the £460,000 figure came from and described it as ‘really bad negotiation’ adding it was ‘very dodgy’ if they were to pay that price for the building.

Cllr Paul Miller explained that although Cabinet resolved to buy the building they would need to some further work on the masterplan.

He said: “If once we have done the work we decide we don’t need Ocky White, it needs to be demolished and we wouldn’t accept the grant and refurbish building.”

Cllr Stoddart said that wasn’t the impression the public got and said he did not want to see the authority with another Cherry Grove on its hands.

Summing up he said it was the view of the committee that there was no problem with the council buying the building but that there was a problem with the price.

Cllr Jamie Adams moved that the Committee does not support the decision of Cabinet due to inevitable ongoing revenue risk and that the purchase price offers poor value for this Council. It was seconded by Cllr Pugh and was passed by a majority with Cllr Alison Tudor voting against.

News

Heavenly Host of Angels Event at St Katharine and St Peter’s Church

Published

on

THE HEAVENLY HOST OF ANGELS will be open at St Katharine and St Peter’s Church, Milford Haven, this weekend, offering a warm and welcoming space for all.

When:

  • Saturday, January 11: 4:00pm – 7:00pm
  • Sunday, January 12: 4:00pm – 7:00pm
  • Monday, January 13: 4:00pm – 7:00pm

Entry is free, and children will receive glow sticks to add to the magical atmosphere. Whether you’re looking to hunt for your angel or simply relax and enjoy the peaceful surroundings, all are welcome to drop in.

Donations in aid of Wales Air Ambulance are optional and much appreciated.

Additionally, on Sunday, January 12, a special Mass at 9:30am will celebrate the Second Sunday of Epiphany and the Baptism of Christ.

Come along and experience this beautiful event – “Come and See.”

Continue Reading

Business

Wales Tourism Alliance challenges Visitor Levy Bill

Published

on

THE WALES TOURISM ALLIANCE has submitted its formal response to the Welsh Government’s Visitor Levy Bill. The response, delivered to the Finance and the Legislation, Justice, and Constitution Committees, outlines several key concerns about the proposed legislation.

Key issues raised by the WTA

  1. The Welsh Government’s own Explanatory Memorandum and Economic Impact Assessment suggest the policy’s administrative costs will outweigh the revenue generated.
  2. The Bill extends beyond tourism visits, encompassing stays of less than 31 days for purposes such as work or education.
  3. Local authorities will retain sole control over any net revenue, with no obligation to allocate funds to tourism-related initiatives.
  4. The data underpinning the policy and its assumptions are unreliable and raise significant concerns.
  5. Industry input, including that from Wales’s own tourism forum chairs, has been inadequately considered.
  6. The policy fails to account for the pressures already impacting Welsh tourism over the past five years.

Industry reaction

WTA Chair Rowland Rees-Evans voiced disappointment over the proposal, which the Welsh Government’s own Economic Impact Assessment predicts could lead to net job losses.

“The WTA has engaged with the Welsh Government since the Visitor Levy was proposed, and we are disappointed they are pursuing a policy their own analysis suggests will have a negative impact on employment,” Rees-Evans stated.

“The tourism industry in Wales is still recovering from the devastating effects of Covid-19, grappling with the 182-day rule on holiday lets, and facing ongoing challenges from the cost-of-living crisis. Additionally, businesses are contending with a 40% rise in the living wage since 2020 and increased national insurance contributions starting this April.

“To impose another burden on a fragile sector, which employs over 20% of the workforce in some parts of Wales, is not in the best interest of the country.”

Rees-Evans emphasized the broader implications of the levy, stating:
“We must also dispel the notion that this is solely a Tourist Tax. It is a Visitor Levy that will affect everyone in Wales – from children on overnight school trips to patients requiring overnight stays before early NHS admissions.”

Pictured: Rowland Rees-Evans, Chair of the Wales Tourism Alliance

Continue Reading

News

Petition demanding resignation of Neyland councillor sparks public outcry

Published

on

A PETITION demanding the immediate resignation of Neyland Town Councillor Mike Harry has taken centre stage ahead of an extraordinary council meeting scheduled for Thursday, January 16. The petition, started by Nicholas Wilson, accuses Cllr Harry of breaching the council’s code of conduct by making derogatory remarks about constituents in an email circulated to all town councillors.

In the email, Cllr Harry referred to some constituents as “degenerates” and “cronies from the Foresters bar,” remarks that have been labelled offensive and unbecoming of a public representative. The petition has gathered momentum in Neyland, with supporters calling for accountability and demanding higher standards from their councillors. “This kind of language and attitude has no place in our town council,” one petitioner commented.

First meeting since october 2024

The extraordinary meeting marks the first official gathering of Neyland Town Council since October 2024, after months of internal conflict and public disputes among councillors. It will take place at 6:00pm in the Viewing Gallery of Neyland Community Hub, a change from the usual venue due to a Labour Party quiz occupying the main meeting rooms. However, the relocation means there will be no audio-visual support for the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting is notably sparse, with a single item for discussion: council finance, specifically the budget and precept for 2025/26. Despite the narrow focus of the agenda, the meeting is expected to be overshadowed by the ongoing controversy surrounding Cllr Harry and the fallout from his remarks.

Escalating internal tensions

The controversy stems from an email in which Cllr Harry expressed frustration over disputes with colleagues and constituents. In the email, he dismissed critics as an “irrelevant minority” and accused them of spreading “garbage.” He also took aim at a former councillor, claiming they had resigned over a prejudicial interest relating to the construction of the Neyland Community Hub.

These comments have ignited outrage among residents, some of whom are now questioning the culture within the council. The petition has called for Cllr Harry’s removal, arguing that his remarks damage public trust in the council’s ability to serve the community.

Public divisions and Ombudsman’s investigation

Cllr Harry has defended his actions, stating that he is awaiting a decision from the Ombudsman regarding ongoing disputes. He maintains that the allegations against him are unfounded and insists that his comments have been taken out of context.

While his supporters argue that the email reflects frustration amid a difficult period for the council, critics believe the remarks highlight deeper issues within Neyland Town Council. The council has been mired in internal disputes for months, resulting in delays and cancellations of meetings, further fuelling dissatisfaction among residents.

Neyland watches closely

With tensions running high, the upcoming meeting is expected to draw significant public interest. Whether the petition will prompt immediate action or further divide the council remains to be seen. For now, the focus of the meeting is set to be council finances, but the controversy surrounding Cllr Harry is unlikely to be ignored.

The Herald will provide updates on this developing story as the situation unfolds.

Continue Reading

Community8 hours ago

Engineering work to bring major disruptions across local rail network

TRANSPORT FOR WALES, in partnership with Network Rail, has announced a comprehensive programme of engineering works across the South West...

Charity1 day ago

Couple and dog rescued after being cut off by tide in Tenby

TENBY’S inshore lifeboat was called to action shortly before 1:00pm on Friday (Jan 10) following reports of a couple and...

News2 days ago

Pembrokeshire County Council suffers major funding cut

THE FUNDING of schemes already underway has been threatened by the change in government in Westminster. The Labour administration has...

News2 days ago

Cabinet to vote on Lower Priory flood prevention scheme

ON MONDAY, January 13, the County Council’s Cabinet will decide whether to make an application to the Welsh Government to fund...

Health2 days ago

Pressure remains high across NHS in Wales say NHS Confederation

A WELSH NHS Confederation spokesperson has highlighted the immense pressure currently facing health and social care services in Wales due...

News2 days ago

Neyland council faces backlash as residents demand unity

MONTHS of turmoil at Neyland Town Council have culminated in frustration among residents, who are now calling for councillors to...

News3 days ago

Snow and ice alert issued for Pembrokeshire: What you need to know

Residents in Pembrokeshire are being urged to prepare for potential travel disruption as a yellow weather warning for snow and...

Crime4 days ago

Garage owner faces rape charge, case sent to Crown Court

A HAVERFORDWEST garage proprietor has been dealt what has been described as ‘very stringent bail conditions’ after appearing before a...

Crime6 days ago

Dyfed-Powys Police pays out hundreds of thousands in compensation claims

NEW figures reveal Dyfed-Powys Police has paid out £324,000 in compensation over the past five years, following nearly 200 claims...

News6 days ago

Rail passengers in west Wales ‘let down’ by hundreds of train cancellations

RAIL passengers in west Wales are being “let down” following the cancellation of more than 650 Transport for Wales (TfW)...

Popular This Week