News
Hancock’s half measure
HAVING demanded an explanation from a key Council Scrutiny Committee in relation to the controversial decision to impose steep charges for day centre use, the Cabinet member responsible pronounced himself dissatisfied with the response received from the Committee.
Labour Party turncoat Simon Hancock, declared at Monday’s meeting of the IPPG Cabinet that the figure of £10 proposed by the Scrutiny Committee: “appeared to be plucked out of thin air.”
The former Labour Party member failed to alert his IPPG fellows that so flawed was the Council’s own consultation process and so few were the responses to its request for financial information from service users, that the figure of £23.70 PER DAY the Cabinet wants to charge for day centre services for the elderly is no more than guesswork itself.
Instead Councillor Hancock selected a figure half way between the Committee’s reluctant suggestion of a £10 charge per day and his own preferred option of £23.70 per day to run until September.
Labour leader Paul Miller said of his former party colleague’s scheme:
‘It doesn’t surprise me at all that Cabinet yesterday voted to ignore the recommendation of scrutiny and press ahead with huge increases in the charges for day centres across Pembrokeshire.
“While I accept that these charges are means tested, certain families and individuals who have a little but not a lot will be hit disproportionately and that is simply not acceptable.”
The Council is yet to reveal the projected additional cost to it of means-testing users of day centre services, or even whether the elderly or frail will be offered independent assistance to complete the Council’s inquisition into their financial affairs ahead of the charges’ imposition.
Health
GP patient lists ‘generally sound’, audit finds
Controls against list inflation appear effective, but some duplicates and deceased records remained
GP practice patient lists in Wales are in “good health overall”, with no immediate evidence of fraud found in a new data-matching exercise carried out with NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership (NWSSP), according to Audit Wales.
The pilot focused on two areas that can affect the accuracy of practice lists and, by extension, the way practices are funded: duplicate patient registrations and deceased individuals not being removed in a timely manner.
Audit Wales said the payment system for GP practices is complex, but patient numbers sit at the heart of it — creating an inherent risk that inflated lists could lead to incorrect payments. Accurate lists also support wider primary care management, including ensuring patients receive timely invitations for services such as screening and preventing people who should not be registered from blocking appointment invitations.
While auditors found no immediate evidence of fraud in the areas examined, a small number of errors were identified.
The exercise found 140 duplicate registrations to date, with a further 395 potential matches still under investigation. It also identified 15 cases where deceased individuals remained on GP patient lists, with some left on the lists for a significant period.
Audit Wales said these issues meant some GP funding had been allocated inaccurately, but the amount involved was low.
The findings suggest patient list inflation controls are generally sound in the areas covered by the pilot, though NWSSP is working to strengthen its central controls. Audit Wales also noted recent wider IT system changes affecting England, Wales and the Isle of Man.
Auditor General for Wales Adrian Crompton said data matching and other analytic techniques are becoming increasingly important as public bodies tackle risks around fraud and error.
He said: “The results from this exercise have not identified significant concerns about the accuracy of GP patient lists and that is a good thing. But there is no room for complacency. I therefore welcome the way in which NWSSP has taken forward learning from this exercise as part of wider improvements it has already made.”
The pilot compared certain personal details for permanently registered adult patients across GP lists in Wales and against UK Government death registration records. It identified just over 7,000 potential matches from around 2.7 million records processed, with most of the matches investigated by NWSSP found to be explainable false positives.
Audit Wales said the Auditor General is the independent statutory external auditor of the devolved Welsh public sector, responsible for the annual audit of the majority of public money spent in Wales.
Crime
Drug dealer caught with £11,400 cocaine stash hidden in underwear
Judge criticises “long and inexcusable delay” as Saundersfoot man is jailed for 27 months
A COCAINE dealer who tried to conceal drugs in his underwear was caught with a high-purity stash worth more than £11,000, a court heard.
Thomas Groves, 37, of Whitlow, Saundersfoot, was arrested after police stopped his car in Carmarthen on Friday, April 8, 2022.
Prosecutor Sian Cutter told Swansea Crown Court officers searched the vehicle and seized Groves’s phone. During a further search, police found a bag of white powder hidden in his underwear.
Testing showed it contained 19.5g of cocaine at 75% purity, with an estimated street value of £11,400.
Judge Paul Thomas KC criticised Dyfed-Powys Police for what he called a “long and inexcusable delay” in bringing the case to court.
The judge noted that part of the delay was caused by Groves refusing to provide the PIN for his phone, but said the police also bore responsibility because of their “tardiness”. Ms Cutter apologised to the court for the time the case had taken.
Groves pleaded guilty to possession with intent to supply cocaine. He has one previous conviction, for drink-driving in 2010.
Defence barrister Emily Bennett said Groves had recently become a father, after his partner gave birth two months ago. The court heard he was working as a supervisor at Hinkley Point nuclear power station in Somerset and was well regarded.
Ms Bennett said Groves was a cocaine user at the time of the offence and had been supplying friends. She added: “The defendant knows he faces a custodial sentence today… This will be his first experience of custody.”
Sentencing him, Judge Thomas said the delay would be reflected in the final term. Groves was jailed for 27 months and will serve half in custody before being released on licence.
He is due to face a proceeds of crime hearing in May.
Education
Village school governors publish counter-proposal on first day of closure consultation
GOVERNORS at Ysgol Meidrim in Carmarthenshire have published a counter-proposal to the council’s plan to close the village school, as the six-week public consultation gets underway today (Jan 16).
The start of the consultation had originally been scheduled for Tuesday (Jan 13) but was delayed after the council had not completed the Welsh-language translation of the consultation documents in time.

In a message to the Chair of Governors, Ann Jones, the council’s Chief Executive, Wendy Walters, confirmed the consultation period would begin today (Jan 16). It is expected that both the Welsh and English versions of the consultation document will appear on the council’s website.
In response, the school’s governors have released their own 73-page counter-proposal, developed since the cabinet decision in November to proceed to consultation.
The governors’ plan is to secure a viable long-term future for Ysgol Meidrim by developing the school, outside teaching hours, as a Community Hub. The document includes research and a cost-benefit analysis, along with a list of potential funding sources to support the project.
The proposal, however, depends on the school remaining open and based on the current premises, with governors arguing that the school is essential both as a focal point for young families and as a key part of the funding model.
Alongside the main document, the governors have also published a supplementary paper which sets out alternative savings the council could make — claiming it could reduce education spending by around a quarter of a million pounds without closing community schools.
Supporters say they now want the six-week consultation period to be used for detailed discussions between council officers and governors, with a view to reaching a positive outcome.
Speaking on behalf of the governors, Sian Straczek, of Meidrim, said: “As school governors at Ysgol Meidrim, we were very disappointed that we have not been given a proper chance to explore all future options for the school with council officers.
“The statutory code requires the council to have explored with us all options before proposing closure — otherwise the ‘presumption against closure’ of village schools becomes meaningless.
“We have worked hard on this carefully-costed counter-proposal to develop our school as a valuable community hub out of school hours, and hope that we will now be given the opportunity during the consultation period for practical discussions with officers in a spirit of co-operation.”
The governors have also launched a campaign logo — “Mlaen Meidrim” (“Forward Meidrim”) — as well as a campaign video highlighting the school’s importance to the local community.
On behalf of Cymdeithas yr Iaith in Sir Gâr, Ffred Ffransis said the council’s own figures suggested the financial case for closure was weak.
He said: “The council’s own figures show that there will be 39 pupils at Ysgol Meidrim in two years, and that the total saving from closing the school — after deducting additional school transport costs — is only claimed to be £13,000 a year.
“If such a school is closed, then 20 more rural Welsh-medium schools will be under threat, in a total annihilation of our rural communities.
“The governors at Meidrim, all volunteers, have produced an amazing document and deserve a proper hearing, not just the standard negative written responses. Their counter-proposal could be an exciting pilot project — both in community-based primary education and in the wider revival of Welsh-speaking rural communities.
“Over the last decade Carmarthenshire County Council has been far more open in its discussions than was previously the case, and our hope is that there will now be positive, two-way discussion rather than the usual sterile negative responses.”
-
Crime1 day agoMilford Haven man tells jury he feared being run over outside pub
-
Crime2 days agoMan jailed after samurai sword brandished in Pembroke Dock street brawl
-
Crime3 days agoFather jailed for 35 years after baby hurled at television
-
Crime6 days agoMan pleads guilty after £150k drugs haul found in Pembroke traffic stop
-
Education3 days agoPembrokeshire Learning Centre placed in special measures following Estyn inspection
-
Crime1 day agoDock woman sentenced after assault on neighbour during ‘psychotic episode’
-
Crime3 days agoMilford Haven man, 65, convicted of sexual assault on teenage girl
-
Crime1 day agoOn-duty paramedic racially abused at Withybush General Hospital








Gary Slack
July 9, 2014 at 1:21 pm
Yet another show of the councils inability to consult properly, or lack of wanting to in order to get what they want, then impose their decision on the vulnerable who do not have the means or ability to challenge the mighty wealth of the councils legal system, for which we are paying for. This current council stinks to high heaven, but who has the time and money to keep challenging them?
John Hudson
July 14, 2014 at 8:41 am
The whole points of the imposition of these increased charges for social services ( or budget cuts as preferred by the Council)was to achieve an £800,000 full year “saving” in the budget for 2014/15. This was factored into the approved budget, in advance of the final agreement on exact charges.
However, delays in the implementation or introduction of the suite of agreed increased and new charges means that there is a shortfall of income during 2014/15.
Has this matter been addressed or even considered by Cabinet? Of course not, it never ever bothers about the cost or effects of its decisions. This is left to officers to sort out.
The Council, only supports those people whose needs are assessed as critical or substantial and thus qualify for financial help and will only pay up to the Cap of £50 per week depending on a means test.
This cap has recently been increased to £55 per week, rising to £60 in 2015/16.
If your needs are critical and substantial and under the means test you contribution was capped at £50, you could following a new means test, need to find an extra £5 per week.
I believe the Council gets a grant towards meeting the true cost of providing service and any gap for providing services above the £55 per week cap paid by clients.
Tomos
July 14, 2014 at 11:13 am
Why does the council appear to hate the elderly and the disabled and want them to pay the most – same with blue badge parking – hide the fact they have to pay so they pay £80 and not forty pence
Roy Mcgurn
July 15, 2014 at 3:37 pm
The council does not hate the elderly. They just want to achieve the lowest rates in Wales by taking from, or depriving, anyone who isn’t a serious ballot box risk. The is not the land of more for less, but of less for less, with some getting even less than others!
Think about it, some of the highest paid officers in Wales, the lowest rates – it has to come from somewhere. Peter has been robbed to pay Paul, only in this instance Peter is getting on a bit.