News
Tankers carrying Russian oil to Milford Haven are still on the way to Port
YESTERDAY’S direction by The Department of Transport that ships owned, controlled, chartered, or operated by any person connected with Russia, will not stop oil tankers carrying Russian oil coming to Milford Haven it has emerged.
There have been calls to the government to block ships with oil bought from Russia docking in Milford Haven. The money from the sale of the oil is being used to finance Russia’s illegal war on Ukraine, it has been argued.
Milford Haven Port Authority said it was “keen to ensure that the sanctions… are applied here”.
In a statement to BBC Wales the Port said that it will seek clarification on every vessel to determine whether sanctions apply.
As The Pembrokeshire Herald reported yesterday, another vessel from the Russian port of Primorsk is due on Friday, March 4.
Mike Ryan, Harbourmaster at the Port of Milford Haven said: “We understand and share the strength of feeling around Russian-connected vessels entering the Port of Milford Haven, particularly as our town has strong links with Ukraine in its twinning with the city of Uman, however, we do not have the power to unilaterally apply sanctions to a vessel bound for our port.”
Harbourmaster Ryan confirmed the port would not be allowing entry to any ship it had reason to believe was owned, controlled, chartered, or operated by any person connected with Russia.

It will also apply with the new rules to refuse entry to vessels owned, controlled, chartered, or operated by a “designated person” as well as those flying the Russian flag and those registered in Russia.
Mr Ryan added: “The determination of whether a vessel falls within this definition is not simple, but we are keen to ensure that the sanctions from the UK government are applied here in Milford Haven and The Department for Transport (DfT) will be supporting us and other UK ports to identify vessels which they believe should not be serviced.
“In every case we will be seeking clarification from the DfT as to whether sanctions apply to a particular vessel and/or cargo. All of this will be done in collaboration with our terminal customers.”
Milford Haven councillor Stephen Joseph said: “I am 100% against these tankers coming to Milford Haven. And I am 100% behind the people of Ukraine. I also have sympathy for the Russian soldiers who have been, in my view, hoodwinked into this attack. The poor buggers thought they were on an exercise, from what I understand.
“I don’t think that Putin’s actioned have been justified, but I am worried that he is mad enough to do something really stupid to save face or to prevent being overthrown. He rants and raves and changes focus, he is not a rational man.”
Cllr Joseph added: “If the ship is not turned around, I hope that a protest can be organised. I certainly would be attending.”
Sam Kurtz MS said: “Given the horrific images of invasion and war led by Putin’s forces in Ukraine, Grant Shapps and the UK Government have my full support in refusing Russian entry to UK Ports – including those in Pembrokeshire.
“The maritime sector is a fundamental part of international trade; this ban will hit hard on Russia’s economic interests and prohibit their ability to profit from our economic output. It is not appropriate, nor welcome, to continue granting Russian vessels access to our country.
“I welcome this move and I stand in solidarity with the people of Ukraine.”
Paul Davies MS added: “The message is clear: Russian vessels are not welcome at UK ports.
“The UK transport secretary has been very clear. UK ports should not provide access to Russian vessels and further sanctions are being developed
“I welcome this action as part of the package of measures to restrict Russian trade and hold Putin’s government to account for its disgraceful attack on Ukraine.”
A ship carrying oil from Russia docked at Milford Haven on 26 February, before Transport Secretary Grant Shapps wrote to the ports.
The oil tanker, Pluto, arrived at the port on Saturday evening and appears to have unloaded its consignment at the Valero oil refinery.
A second vessel, Louie, is due to arrive from Russia on Friday. Both sail under the flag of the Marshall Islands but carry cargo from the Russian oil-loading port of Primorsk.
Crime
Milford Haven drug dealing pub boss who boasted of ‘best coke around’ jailed
Dealer who claimed £160,000 profits was later calling police for protection as threats escalated over money he owed to his suppliers
A MILFORD HAVEN drug dealer who bragged he had “the best coke out there” and claimed to have made up to £160,000 in just four months has been jailed for six years.
But behind the image of a confident, high-earning operator, the reality was starkly different — a man in debt, under threat, and repeatedly calling police for protection as his world closed in.

The 35-year-old defendant admitted multiple offences relating to the supply of cocaine and cannabis when he appeared before Swansea Crown Court.
The court heard he played a significant role in the supply of Class A and Class B drugs, purchasing large quantities — including claims he was buying cocaine by the kilogram — and maintaining contact with upstream suppliers.
In messages shown to the court, he boasted about his profits, claiming to have made £38,000 and suggesting that far larger sums were within reach. He also claimed to have earned £160,000 in just four months and said he had bought two houses.
He told customers he had “the best coke out there” and responded aggressively to complaints, stating: “Out of £30,000 worth, you’re the only one to complain,” before adding: “Bad mouthing me is a bad idea you little slag.”

Violence and intimidation
The court was also shown chilling footage of a confrontation at a property on the Mount Estate, where the defendant was heard directing violence over a debt.
In the video, he shouted: “I got boys, yeah, I got boys,” before telling others to “kick his head in” as the attack unfolded inside the victim’s home.
Witnesses described him as having become a “kingpin” in Milford Haven’s drug scene, operating from The Vibe public house, which they claimed was used as both a legitimate business front and a base linked to drug dealing.
Fear behind the façade
Yet the court heard that behind the bravado, the defendant was living in fear.
He had accumulated drug debts estimated at between £18,000 and £26,000 and was being threatened by those higher up the supply chain. His partner reported people turning up at their home, with threats including claims it would be bombed or burned down.
The Herald attended his home address on multiple occasions to report on police activity after he called officers for protection.
In a direct call to this newspaper during the period, he said: “There are threats to my life — people want me dead, dead. I don’t want this in the paper. It’s over money… hundreds of thousands of pounds.”
Documents reveal further pressure
The Herald can also reveal that the defendant was served with a statutory demand in late 2025 over an alleged unpaid debt relating to stock, fixtures and fittings following his takeover of The Vibe public house in March 2024.
Documents seen by this newspaper indicate the financial pressures he was under extended beyond drug debts.
National attention
The case has already drawn national interest, with Channel 4 making a documentary featuring the defendant after interviewing local people in Milford Haven over recent months.
‘Significant role’ in drug trade
Police arrested the defendant on January 5 last year on suspicion of being concerned in the supply of Class A drugs. A search of an address on Priory Road uncovered 18 grams of cannabis, while a separate incident involving a vehicle led to the discovery of 73 grams of cocaine and cannabis.
Prosecutors said he was actively involved in the supply of drugs and purchasing large quantities, describing him as a key player in the local trade.
He has 57 previous convictions, mostly for theft-related offences.
‘Only a custodial sentence’
Defending, Mr Ibrihim described his client’s background as a “tale of woe,” telling the court his father was addicted to heroin and his mother struggled with alcohol. His younger sister died in 2022.
The court heard he had gone “off the rails” in his late teens and that his drug dealing was linked to debts, including those connected to his father. It was also said that many of his claims about wealth were exaggerated and amounted to “bravado”.
Sentencing, the judge said: “The seriousness of this offending means that only an immediate custodial sentence is appropriate.
“You played a significant role in drug dealing. What is clear is that you were dealing with a lot of cocaine.
“I have no doubt that some of what you did was due to pressure, but some of it was for your own gain.”
The judge added that despite the defendant’s claims of wealth, “you haven’t got hardly anything left”.
For the supply of cocaine, he was sentenced to six years in prison, with a concurrent sentence of 30 months for supplying cannabis.
He will serve at least half the sentence in custody before being eligible for release.
A victim surcharge of £228 was also imposed.
Community
Loose horse sparks police response in Pembroke
Animal seen galloping through residential streets and towards main road
POLICE are reportedly tracking a loose horse which strayed into a residential area of Pembroke.
The animal was first spotted in Gatehouse View before making its way onto a nearby main road.
A post on the Pembroke and Pembroke Dock Citizens’ Forum said the horse had left Gatehouse View and was seen heading towards the road by Pembroke Leisure Centre.
The resident wrote: “Anyone recognise it? Police following it.”
The horse was later reported to be galloping down Buttermilk Lane in the direction of Martha’s.
Stray horses are not uncommon in the area. In January, several animals were reported loose around Pembroke and along the A477, particularly near Buttermilk Close and the Cleddau Bridge.
Those incidents created a hazard for motorists, prompting Pembrokeshire County Council to step in and return the animals. Drivers were advised to take extra care and avoid startling them.
international news
Britain exposed: UK has no real shield against long-range Iranian missile threat
Reliance on US interceptors leaves gaps as Iran’s reach grows
BRITAIN would struggle to defend itself against a long-range ballistic missile attack and would instead rely heavily on American systems based in Eastern Europe and at sea — with no guarantee of success.
That is the stark reality emerging after Iran’s attempted strike on a UK–US base at Diego Garcia on Saturday (March 21), a move that caught many world leaders off guard and marked a significant escalation in capability.

Concerns are further heightened by Iran’s development of larger space launch vehicles, including the Simorgh, Zuljanah, Ghaem-100 and Qased systems, which on paper demonstrate ranges of between 2,200 km and up to 6,000 km, with payload capacities of up to 1,000 kg. While these rockets are officially designed to place satellites into orbit rather than deliver warheads, they use the same multi-stage technology and propulsion systems found in long-range ballistic missiles. Defence analysts have long warned that such programmes provide a clear pathway to intercontinental strike capability, raising the prospect that parts of Europe — and potentially even the UK — could fall within reach if these technologies are adapted for military use.
No UK shield over Britain
The UK has no dedicated system to shoot down long-range ballistic missiles over its own territory.
While RAF Fylingdales provides early warning and tracking, it cannot intercept incoming threats. Britain’s air defence network — including RAF jets and ground systems — is designed for aircraft, drones and cruise missiles, not high-speed ballistic weapons.
In simple terms, if a missile were heading toward a target such as Milford Haven’s energy facilities, there is no British-operated system that could reliably stop it at the last moment.
America would have to act
Instead, any interception attempt would fall to the United States.
Key assets include:
- Aegis Ashore missile defence bases in Romania and Poland
- US Navy warships equipped with SM-3 interceptors
- Wider NATO tracking and coordination systems
These systems are capable of striking a missile in space during its midcourse phase, long before it reaches the UK.
But there is a crucial limitation: they can only engage if the missile passes within range of those systems.
If the trajectory falls outside that envelope — or if no US ship is positioned correctly — there may be no interception at all.
A probability, not protection
Even when an intercept is attempted, success is far from certain.
Testing data for the SM-3 system suggests success rates of roughly 50 to 80 per cent per engagement, depending on conditions. In practice, multiple interceptors are often fired at a single target to improve the odds.
That still leaves a significant margin for failure.
In a real-world scenario involving countermeasures, technical faults or multiple missiles, the chances of at least one getting through rise sharply.
Gaps in coverage
The NATO missile defence network is not a continuous shield.
It is a patchwork of coverage zones tied to specific systems:
- Romania and Poland provide fixed land-based interception capability
- US warships offer flexible but limited coverage depending on deployment
There is no permanent protective umbrella over the UK itself.
If a missile does not pass through one of those defended zones, Britain would effectively be relying on luck and geometry.
Deterrence, not defence
Ultimately, the UK’s primary protection is not interception — it is deterrence.
Any successful strike on British soil would almost certainly trigger a major NATO response, making such an attack extraordinarily risky for any adversary.
But deterrence does not equal defence.
A growing concern
Iran’s attempted long-range strike on Diego Garcia has shifted the debate sharply.
The use of a missile capable of travelling thousands of kilometres surprised many Western leaders, who had not expected Tehran to demonstrate that level of reach in the current crisis. Although one missile failed and another was intercepted, the incident has raised fresh questions about how far Iran’s capabilities have advanced.
For years, the idea of a missile threat to Europe — let alone Britain — was largely theoretical. Now, defence analysts are treating it as a credible future risk, even if capability remains limited today.
The bottom line
The UK can detect a missile, track it, and coordinate a response — but when it comes to actually stopping it, the country would be dependent on American systems operating at distance, with no certainty of success.
If a missile ever did get through, there would be little standing between it and its target.
And that is the uncomfortable truth behind the headlines.
-
News7 days agoFishguard linked to allegations in Many Tears Animal Rescue investigation
-
News5 days agoEmergency services flood Haverfordwest after reports of person in river
-
Crime3 days agoMother given community order after admitting child cruelty offence
-
Health3 days agoNHS waiting list falls — but cancer delays and diagnostic backlog worsen
-
News4 days agoSenedd vote to ban greyhound racing hailed as ‘landmark moment’ by charities
-
international news7 days agoUK considers military options as pressure grows to secure Strait of Hormuz
-
News4 days agoSenedd votes to ban Greyhound racing in Wales to protect animal welfare
-
Crime6 days agoMan cleared of sexual assault allegation after magistrates rule no case to answer












