News
Tanker on way back to Milford despite opposition from locals and politicians
IT’S the oil tanker which kept switching course, first it was heading to Milford Haven, then it was Antwerp, then it was Belfast, but now it is Milford Haven again. An attempt to confuse the public, moaning politicans? Or is the unfolding situation in Ukraine confusing the owners themselves? Its a question of many people’s lips.
Local councillor Stephen Joseph, who represents Milford Haven Central at Pembrokeshire County Council, has called for people to protest; “We can not let this oil be unloaded here” he said.
This tanker laiden with upto 20,000 tonnes of Russian oil, and hundreds of residents from Milford Haven have said that given the crisis in the Ukraine it is not welcome in Wales.
The First Minister Mark Drakeford and Plaid Leader Adam Price have been the latest politicians to say they dont want to see Russian oil landed here.
It comes as Adam Price has called for no Russian oil to enter Welsh ports while “innocent blood is being shed in Ukraine”.
Mark Drakeford backed the call made by the Plaid Cymru leader during First Minister’s Questions on Tuesday.

That was echoed by local MS Sam Kurtz.
He said: “Given the horrific images of invasion and war led by Putin’s forces in Ukraine, Grant Shapps has my full support in refusing Russian entry to UK Ports.
“The maritime sector is a fundamental part of international trade; this ban will hit hard on Russia’s economic interests and prohibit their ability to profit from our economic output.
“It is not appropriate, nor welcome, to continue granting Russian vessels access to our country. I welcome this move and I stand in solidarity with the people of Ukraine.”
PORT HAS NO POWERS
But the Port of Milford Haven said it has no power to stop vessels with cargo from Russia except under specific circumstances.
In a letter to stakeholders dated March 1, Andy Jones CEO of the Port of Miford Haven said: “The Department of Transport have today confirmed that the UK sanctions DO NOT APPLY (our emphasis) to cargo or vessels purely because they are coming from Russia. Therefore, as we do not haev the power to unilaterally apply santions to a vessel bound for our Port, we are legally obliged to service them.”
Mr Jones added: “The DfT will be supporting us and other UK ports to identify vessels, on a case-by-case basis, which they believe should not be serviced. All of this will be done in collaboration with our terminal customers.”
In the letter Mr Jones also said: “Whilst the headlines being reported suggest that all UK ports are to refuse entry to Russian-connected vessels, this is not as straightforward as that, as this sanction is directed at ownership and control [and not Russian cargo].”

LOCAL MP’s CONCERNS
Commenting on the ‘Louie’ which is destined for Puma Energy, Preseli Pembrokeshire MP, Stephen Crabb said: “There is understandably a significant amount of community concern about the impending arrival of the Louie at the Port of Milford Haven.
“I have been seeking clarity about the situation from both the UK Transport Minister and the Port of Milford Haven.
“Whilst I understand that the vessel is not Russian owned, and is not included in the Government legislation, the cargo has been loaded at a Russian Port. Many people in the community feel strongly that even accepting cargo that has come from Russia is just simply not acceptable given the appalling situation in Ukraine.”

“I fully support the work that has been done by the UK Government to ban any ships that are Russian flagged, registered or controlled from entering British ports as this strong action is exactly what is needed to impose tough economic penalties on Russia in response to their invasion of Ukraine.
“But I do believe that it needs to go further still, and that the source of the cargo needs to be included in the Government’s sanctions.
“Today, I have written to the Transport Minister, Grant Shapps, asking for more action to extend the legislation to take the cargo into consideration.
“I understand that the Port and the Department for Transport are continuing to work closely to identify ships that meet the UK sanctions, and prevent them from entering while Russia continues to invade Ukraine.
“Being home to one of the UK’s busiest ports, local residents will want to see that absolutely everything is being done to ensure that a firm stand is taken against Russia and the war being raged against Ukraine.”
The Herald is awaiting for a comment from Puma Energy.
(Cover image: Milford Haven Port Authority)

Crime
Lamphey parent fined over child’s school attendance record
A PARENT from the Lamphey area has been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, magistrates heard.
The case was dealt with in the defendant’s absence at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) following proceedings brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that between Wednesday (April 30) and Friday (May 23), the parent failed to secure regular school attendance for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
The offence was brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
The case was proved in absence, and magistrates imposed a fine of £220. The parent was also ordered to pay an £88 victim services surcharge and £100 in prosecution costs.
A collection order was made, with the total balance of £408 to be paid by Thursday (Jan 9).
Magistrates imposed reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images. The restrictions remain in force until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Haverfordwest couple fined over child’s school attendance
A COUPLE from the Haverfordwest school area have been fined after failing to ensure their child attended school regularly, a magistrates’ court has heard.
The pair were dealt with at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11) in separate but linked cases brought by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that over a period in May, the couple failed to secure regular attendance at school for their child, who was of compulsory school age at the time.
Both cases were brought under section 444 of the Education Act 1996, which places a legal duty on parents to ensure their children attend school regularly.
One parent admitted the offence, with the guilty plea taken into account during sentencing. They were fined £40 and ordered to pay a £16 victim services surcharge and £128 in prosecution costs.
The second parent did not attend court and the case was proved in absence. Magistrates imposed a £60 fine, along with a £24 victim services surcharge and £100 in costs.
Collection orders were made in both cases, with payments set at £24 per month starting in January.
Magistrates imposed strict reporting restrictions under section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. These prohibit the publication of any information that could identify the child involved, including names, addresses, schools, workplaces or images.
The restrictions remain in place until the child reaches the age of eighteen.
Crime
Trefin dog case ends in forfeiture order after protection notice breach
Village protest followed months of complaints about barking
A WOMAN from north Pembrokeshire has been fined £1,000 and ordered to forfeit four dogs after repeatedly breaching a Community Protection Notice issued following complaints and protests in her village.

Julia Goodgame, aged fifty-eight, of Bryn Y Derwydd, Trefin, appeared before Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday (Dec 11), where she admitted failing to comply with the terms of a notice served by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The court heard that on Friday (June 20) Goodgame failed to secure control of her dogs just three days after a Community Protection Notice was issued on Tuesday (June 17). The notice was served under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
The case followed months of complaints from residents in Trefin relating to dog noise and control. Earlier this year, the dispute escalated into a public protest in the village, with a number of residents gathering to raise concerns about constant barking and its impact on daily life.
Goodgame had previously denied breaching the notice when she first appeared before magistrates in September. At that hearing, the council alleged multiple breaches across June and July and said enforcement action had been taken only after informal measures failed. A trial was later listed for Monday (Nov 10), with several witnesses expected to give evidence.

However, at the November hearing, Goodgame changed her plea from not guilty to guilty to one offence, with the remaining allegations not proceeded with.
As part of Wednesday’s sentence, magistrates ordered the immediate forfeiture and seizure of four Border Collie dogs, which Goodgame told the court were the only dogs in her possession.
Authorised officers from Pembrokeshire County Council are permitted to seize the dogs, with custody transferred to the council or an approved animal welfare organisation to ensure their humane handling and care. The court granted the council powers to rehome the dogs through reputable animal welfare organisations, or to destroy them if deemed necessary.
Goodgame was also ordered to pay the reasonable costs of seizure, transport, detention and any veterinary treatment required, along with additional enforcement costs.
A Criminal Behaviour Order was imposed until further order of the court. The order prohibits Goodgame from allowing her dogs to create unreasonable noise, leaving dogs outdoors while she is absent from the property, or allowing dog faeces to accumulate at the address. Any waste stored on the premises must be kept in secured bins away from boundary fences.
In addition to the £1,000 fine, she was ordered to pay a £400 victim services surcharge and £1,200 in prosecution costs. A collection order was made, allowing deductions to be taken directly from benefits if necessary.
The forfeiture order was made under section 50 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
-
Crime5 days agoPhillips found guilty of raping baby in “worst case” judge has ever dealt with
-
Crime4 days agoKilgetty scaffolder sentenced after driving with cocaine and in system
-
Crime4 days agoHousing site director sentenced after failing to provide breath sample following crash
-
Crime4 days agoMotorist banned for three years after driving with cannabis in system
-
Education3 days agoTeaching assistant struck off after asking pupil for photos of her body
-
News6 days agoJury retires tomorrow in harrowing Baby C rape trial
-
Crime4 days agoMilford Haven pensioner denies exposure charges
-
Crime17 hours agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven








