News

FSA urges people in Wales to “face freezer fears” in a bid to tackle food waste

Published

10 years ago

July 4, 2016

shutterstock_172214228 MISCONCEPTIONS about how to freeze food safely are contributing to food waste in Wales and across the UK, according to new research by the Food Standards Agency (FSA).

The research – released as part of Food Safety Week (Jul 4 – 10) – identified a number of freezing ‘myths’ that are preventing people in Wales from using their freezers to make food go further. 37% of those interviewed think that food should only be frozen on the day of purchase to be safe; 34% incorrectly said it is dangerous to refreeze meat after it has been cooked; and 39% wrongly believe that food can become unsafe to eat while in the freezer.

Three quarters (75%) of people surveyed in Wales have thrown food away in the past month, with bread (46%), fruit (39%), vegetables (34%) and leftover meals (25%) topping the list. The most common reason given by respondents in Wales for throwing food away is that they had bought too much of it, cited by 34% of people. 31% admit to throwing food away because it was past its ‘use by’ date, and over half (56%) say they feel guilty when they throw food away. However, the reasons given can all be avoided by making better use of the freezer.

In response, the FSA is focusing this year’s Food Safety Week on helping people to understand how to waste less food safely by making more of their freezers. Furthermore, the FSA, working with Defra and WRAP, has announced that it will be launching a review of the guidance provided to the food industry on date marking on food. This will include consideration for whether the remit of the guidance should be expanded to cover food storage and freezing advice for consumers.

The research also found that 93% of people in Wales say there are foods they would never freeze. A quarter (25%) of those surveyed in Wales would never freeze meat that was cooked after defrosting, with 78% of these people saying this is down to worries about food poisoning.

Steve Wearne, Director of Policy at the FSA, said:

“Every year, we throw away seven million tonnes of food and drink from our homes. Much of this waste is unnecessary, and a better understanding of how to freeze food safely could go a significant way towards tackling the problem.

“Our research shows that many of the fears the public has about freezing food are unfounded and we need to ensure they know the facts. 33% of the people we spoke to in Wales said that more information about how to safely freeze food would help them to reduce their food waste – that’s why freezing is the focus of this year’s Food Safety Week.

“The freezer is like a pause button, so you can freeze foods right up to the ‘use by’ date. While food is kept safe in the freezer, it’s the quality that deteriorates over time, so we recommend eating it within three to six months and checking for any freezing instructions on the packaging. Once defrosted, the pause button is off, so defrost food as and when you need it and eat it within 24 hours of it being fully defrosted.”

Helen White, food waste expert at Love Food Hate Waste, said:

“In the UK each household wastes the equivalent of about six meals a week, which is bad for our pockets and the planet! Reducing food waste is a big challenge, so the Love Food Hate Waste campaign is delighted to lend its support to Food Safety Week, which aims to raise awareness of this important issue. Freezing food is one of the little things we can all do to make a big difference and the best bit is that most foods can be frozen – even those you wouldn’t expect! For more fantastic freezer facts, visit wales.lovefoodhatewaste.com or hoffibwydcasaugwastraff.com.”

Top 10 tips to help reduce food waste

1) Know the difference between “use by” and “best before” dates

“Use by” dates are the most important ones to consider, as these relate to food safety. Most foods can be frozen safely up until the “use by” date, but not after.

“Best before” dates are about quality, not safety. When the date is passed, it doesn’t mean that the food will be harmful, but it might begin to lose its flavour and texture.

2) Don’t trust the sniff test!
Food can look and smell fine even after its use-by date, but that doesn’t mean it’s safe to eat. It could still be contaminated. You cannot see, smell or taste the bugs that cause food poisoning.

3) How long can I freeze things for and what about the Use by date?
Foods can be stored safely in a correctly functioning freezer for years without going off. The freezer is like a pause button, so you can freeze foods safely right up to the “use by” date. Whilst food is kept safe in the freezer, it’s the quality that deteriorates over time, so we recommend consumption within three to six months to ensure the best quality, and check for any freezing instructions on the packaging.

Once defrosted, the pause button is off, so it’s best to defrost food as required and eat within 24 hours of it being fully defrosted.

4) When should I freeze food?
Many people believe food can only be frozen on the day of purchase – as often recommended by retailers to preserve the quality of the food. However, you can safely freeze most foods right up to the “use by” date. Although it would be good to freeze the food as soon as you know you aren’t going to use it before its “use by” date expires.

5) Did you know that you can safely freeze raw and cooked meats?
You can cook defrosted meat into a new meal and freeze for use on another day. Simply defrost overnight in the fridge (be careful that raw meat doesn’t drip on any other foods in the fridge and check it is thoroughly defrosted), use within 24 hours and cook until steaming hot.

6) How long can you freeze meat for?
Generally you can freeze meat for a long time and it will still be safe to eat, but the quality will deteriorate so it’s best to eat it within three to six months to ensure it’s of the best quality. Don’t worry if it’s frozen for longer – try marinating it before cooking to improve texture or use herbs and spices to add flavour.

7) Make the most of multi buys
If you are taking advantage of multi buys or larger pack sizes (e.g chicken breasts) you can freeze them individually in smaller bags to avoid having to eat them all at once. You can also cook enough for two (or more!) meals and eat one and freeze some for later – this avoids waste and minimises the effort of cooking.

8) Batching cooking
Batch cooking, cooking new meals from leftovers and freezing of homemade foods, can be a great way of saving money (and time) and using up foods approaching their Use By date as well as reducing waste.

9) Wrap up
It is best to place food in an air tight container or wrap food well in freezer bags, freezer wrap or cling film before placing in the freezer otherwise the cold air will dry it out. Try to expel any air from freezer bags.

10) Planning
Try and get into the habit of checking what you already have in the fridge and freezer before you go shopping. Use up foods that are approaching their Use by date and other fresh foods like fruit and vegetables, meat, fish, cheese or milk first as these can go off over time.

News

Lib Dems take Powys seat after hard-fought battle with Reform

Published

5 hours ago

July 5, 2026

Tom Sinclair

Local farmer Colin Millichap wins Yscir with Honddu Isaf and Llanddew by-election

THE WELSH LIBERAL DEMOCRATS have won a closely watched Powys by-election, taking the Yscir with Honddu Isaf and Llanddew seat after a hard-fought contest with Reform UK.

Local farmer Colin Millichap topped the poll for the Lib Dems with 297 votes, securing 39.6 per cent of the vote. Reform UK’s Dawn McIntosh finished second with 259 votes, or 34.5 per cent.

Plaid Cymru came third with 96 votes, followed by the Welsh Conservatives on 68, the Green Party on 15 and Welsh Labour on 14. Turnout was just over 51 per cent.

The result is politically significant because the ward had previously been represented by Iain McIntosh, who was elected as a Conservative before later sitting as a Reform councillor. Mr McIntosh has since been elected to the Senedd.

The contest was one of three Powys County Council by-elections held on Thursday, July 2, after sitting councillors were elected to the Senedd in May.

Reform UK held Llanyre with Nantmel, where Gareth Hughes was elected with 359 votes. The Liberal Democrats finished second there with 226 votes, ahead of the Conservatives on 210.

Plaid Cymru also successfully defended Glantwymyn, where Rwth Hughes secured a comfortable victory with 513 votes. Reform UK finished a distant second on 63 votes.

The Yscir result will be seen as a boost for the Liberal Democrats ahead of next year’s full council elections in Powys, where the party is already part of the ruling minority administration.

Welsh Liberal Democrat MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe, David Chadwick, described the result as “phenomenal” and said it showed the party could challenge Reform in rural Wales.

He said: “This is a phenomenal result for Colin and a massive win for the Welsh Liberal Democrats. Winning in Reform’s own backyard proves that when it comes to the next council elections, the real choice is between the Lib Dems and Reform.

“The political dividing line for our communities is now crystal clear. It is a choice between the Welsh Liberal Democrats, who work hard, focus on practical solutions, and are determined to get things done for local people, versus those who simply look to complain, manufacture anger, and channel rage from the sidelines without offering any real answers.

“Colin’s victory shows that voters are rejecting empty populism in favour of local champions who actually care about delivering results. We will carry this momentum straight into next year’s local elections in Powys.”

Mr Millichap is a well-known local farmer who lives in Llandefalle with his wife Mandy. The couple have four children and two grandchildren.

He farms with his wife and three sons at Llandefalle and Yscirfawr, Merthyr Cynog, running a sheep flock and suckler cow herd.

He is a former chairman of NFU Cymru in Brecon and Radnor, has served on the organisation’s Livestock Board, and currently sits on the Less Favoured Area Board.

Crime

Fishguard man cleared after five years in prison refused compensation again

Published

6 hours ago

July 5, 2026

Tom Sinclair

Brian Buckle’s case raises fresh questions over justice system that says a man can be cleared by a jury but still not qualify for a payout

A FISHGUARD man who spent more than five years in prison before being cleared by a jury has been refused miscarriage of justice compensation for a second time.

Brian Buckle was convicted of historical child sexual offences in 2017 and sentenced to 15 years in prison.

He always maintained his innocence.

After a long legal battle by his family and defence team, his conviction was ruled unsafe by the Court of Appeal in 2022. He was released from prison and later faced a retrial at Swansea Crown Court.

In May 2023, after fresh forensic evidence was put before the court, a jury unanimously found him not guilty.

But according to BBC Wales, the Ministry of Justice has now rejected his compensation claim again following a further review.

The decision has caused anger in Pembrokeshire and at Westminster because Mr Buckle’s case exposes a brutal gap in the justice system.

He has cleared his name in court.

He has been found not guilty by a jury.

But the compensation scheme still says he has not met the legal test for a payout.

The Herald reported from the retrial in 2023, when Swansea Crown Court heard that the prosecution case had relied in part on forensic evidence said to link Mr Buckle to a childhood diary.

Mr Buckle denied the allegations throughout. His barrister argued that he had never seen the diary before the original 2017 trial. The defence also called forensic evidence about traces of condom lubricant, which helped cast doubt on the earlier case against him.

The jury returned not guilty verdicts and Mr Buckle walked free.

For him and his family, however, the damage was already done.

The legal fight to clear his name is said to have cost around £500,000. In earlier Herald coverage, Mr Buckle said his father-in-law had sold his house to fund the legal battle, his wife’s inheritance had gone, and he had lost a well-paid job he had held for 16 years.

He also missed his daughter’s 18th and 21st birthdays while he was in prison.

Mr Buckle has spoken publicly about living with PTSD following his imprisonment.

He previously said: “I don’t want millions. I just want recognition of the injustice I suffered and the chance to rebuild my life.”

His case has become one of the clearest examples of what campaigners call the “innocence tax”: the huge cost paid by people who are forced to spend years and vast sums of money proving they should never have been jailed in the first place.

The reason Mr Buckle has been refused compensation lies in a controversial change to the law made in 2014.

Before that change, compensation could be paid where a conviction was overturned and the evidence showed that no reasonable jury could have convicted.

Since 2014, the test has been much harder. Applicants must show, beyond reasonable doubt, that they did not commit the offence.

Campaigners say that creates an almost impossible hurdle in many cases.

A person can have their conviction quashed. They can be cleared at retrial. But unless they can produce the sort of conclusive evidence that proves innocence beyond doubt, such as DNA or CCTV, they can still be refused compensation.

That is what has happened to Brian Buckle.

His MP, Ben Lake, has repeatedly raised the case in Parliament.

In March 2025, Mr Lake led a Westminster Hall debate on miscarriage of justice compensation. He told MPs that many people assume those wrongly convicted are compensated when their convictions are overturned, but in England and Wales compensation is often the exception rather than the rule.

He said the system was forcing people who had already been cleared to prove their innocence all over again.

Mr Lake has described Mr Buckle’s case as one of the clearest injustices he has encountered during his time as an MP.

The issue was also raised directly with Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Prime Minister’s Questions in July 2025.

Mr Lake told the Commons that Mr Buckle had been wrongfully imprisoned for more than five years, had been unanimously cleared by a jury, and yet had still been refused compensation because of the 2014 legal test.

The Prime Minister described the case as a “grave miscarriage of justice” and said he had undertaken to look at the statutory test for compensation.

A year on, Mr Buckle has again been told that he does not qualify.

The Ministry of Justice has previously said that refusal of compensation does not affect the fact that Mr Buckle’s conviction was quashed, nor does it cast doubt on the outcome of the appeal.

For his supporters, that is exactly the problem.

The state accepts that his conviction was quashed. A jury has cleared him. But the compensation scheme still says he is not entitled to be paid.

The Government announced last year that compensation caps would be increased for victims of miscarriages of justice. But that does not help people like Mr Buckle if they are ruled ineligible before the amount of any payment is even considered.

The Law Commission is now reviewing the criminal appeals system in England and Wales, including compensation and support for the wrongly convicted.

Its provisional proposals include replacing the current requirement to prove innocence beyond reasonable doubt with a lower test based on the balance of probabilities.

A standalone report on compensation and support for the wrongly convicted is expected by the end of 2026.

Mr Buckle hopes any change will apply retrospectively, so people already caught by the current rules are not left behind.

For Pembrokeshire, this is not simply a legal technicality.

It is the story of a local man who lost years of his life, a family that spent everything trying to clear his name, and a justice system that still appears unable to say the one thing he has been waiting to hear from the state: we got it wrong.

Cover image: Stephen Fildes / BBC

Crime

Prison campaigner admits assaulting woman and police officers

Published

6 hours ago

July 5, 2026

Sarah Jane Absalom

Zachery Lee Griffiths denied intentional strangulation but admitted or indicated guilty pleas to six other charges

A WEST WALES prison campaigner has admitted assaulting a woman and indicated guilty pleas to assaulting two police officers.

Zachery Lee Griffiths, 34, of Golygfor, Llanelli, appeared before Llanelli Magistrates’ Court on Monday, June 30, following incidents in Whitland at the end of June.

Griffiths pleaded guilty to assaulting a woman by beating on June 28.

He also admitted two charges of criminal damage, after damaging a phone and glasses belonging to the same woman. The offences were said to have happened in Whitland on June 26.

Griffiths further indicated a guilty plea to threatening to destroy or damage a Mercedes A180 on June 28.

He also indicated guilty pleas to two charges of assault by beating of an emergency worker, relating to PC 535 Tatum and PC 526 Westron, who were both acting in the exercise of their duties as police officers.

However, Griffiths denied a further charge of intentional strangulation, which is alleged to have taken place in Whitland on June 28.

A full bail argument was heard by the court and Griffiths was remanded on conditional bail.

His bail conditions include a 7pm to 7am curfew, a requirement to live and sleep each night at his address in Llanelli, not to enter Whitland, and not to contact the complainant directly or indirectly.

The court also made a direction under section 36 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, meaning Griffiths will not be permitted to personally cross-examine named witnesses.

Griffiths is due to return to Llanelli Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday, August 12, at 2pm. The next hearing is listed for sentence and has been given a two-hour estimate.