News
No monopoly of wisdom or compassion, says MP
IT’S FUNNY how a spontaneous comment on Facebook can get picked up and played back, but that is what happened to a few words of mine about benefit reform and its impact on Pembrokeshire. And I am glad that it did.
In a thread of comments responding to the local charity PATCH I said that “no Government or Party has a monopoly of wisdom or compassion, and that none were evil either”. I thought no more about it but thanks to the Herald, I am now.
One of the things that I find frustrating about my job are the claims that there is only ever one cause of the nation’s concerns (them) and only one solution (us). If only it were so easy. The reform of the benefit system was largely seen as essential by all parties, but we differed on the detail. For me benefits are there for people in need; for that time when life goes wrong, when you lose your job or your health; for old age or some other unexpected hardship. They should not be a lifestyle choice, or a cosy alternative to work if work is available or possible.
And I think it is right that the way in which benefits are handed out are as fair to the people paying for them (you and me) as they are the recipient. If that means being reassessed from time to time then so be it. This is taxpayers money and billions of pounds of it.
Did you know that if over your lifetime you earn on average £32,000 or less per year you actually take more out of the state than you put in? I didn’t either, nor did I know that 30% of the UK’s income tax comes from just 1% of people paying it. What this means is that every working family is spending a huge proportion of their cash on benefits for other people – we are all happy to do that if we know those benefits are vital for that person’s quality of life.
By reforming the system like this we get other advantages too. Health and social problems, as well as crime can often be associated with a workless environment or extreme poverty. By changing the system to enable more people to get back to work and stay there we take huge pressure off our NHS, Police, and other services. And the numbers really are looking up. We have more jobs on offer in the region, lower unemployment and lower youth unemployment. New figures show that treatment for drug addiction is getting better. And as for housing I see nothing fair in keeping families in overcrowded conditions if their next door neighbour has two empty spare rooms. Surely we owe it those families to make better use of our housing stock?
Nevertheless I recognise one flaw in this otherwise positive picture. How can we apply these ‘one size fits all solutions’ to a nation which is clearly not one size? How can we make assessments as fair for someone with a mental condition as we do for someone with a limited physical one? Or encourage people to opt for a smaller house if no such houses are available?
This is where fairness comes in and where the nucleus of the problem lies. To be honest I think the Work Capability Assessment has fallen well short of expectations, especially for mental health sufferers. I have highlighted this point in Parliament – but I support the overall aims. The spare room subsidy is perfectly fair, but I regret that we did not have a longer transition period for Councils to work within. (It is of interest that in some councils the “discretionary housing fund” – used to help those facing a spare room subsidy cut – is denied to anybody with a Sky subscription or who smokes)
And it is a source of profound concern that anyone should genuinely face a choice of feeding their families or heating their house or flat. But I support the plans to move, by lots of carrot or a tiny bit of stick, people out of a benefit-dependent lifestyle.
Here in Westminster we mix with members of other Parties much more than the press would ever have you believe. I know and respect my opposition colleagues and in the main our differences are not as pronounced as all that. Strange though it may seem, we all strive to make our home areas that little bit better. The idea that there are any sections of society, young or old, rich or poor for whom we have
nothing but hatred or contempt is simply ridiculous.
This is why MP’s should be entirely non-judgmental when it comes to our constituents. You can love us or loathe us, you can vote for ‘us’ or ‘them’ or for no one at all, but in the end we are here to represent you and to use our judgment in doing so. We don’t always get it right, which is why I used those Facebook words in the first place.
News
Hamilton Academical petition raises new questions for Haverfordwest County
Second winding-up case linked to Rob Edwards and Morley Sports Management adds to concern after Bluebirds’ High Court drama
SUPPORTERS of Haverfordwest County AFC have fresh reason to be concerned after a new winding-up petition emerged in Scotland involving another football business linked to Haverfordwest Chairman, Rob Edwards, and Morley Sports Management.
The latest case is against 1874 Holdings Limited, the company in the ownership chain above Hamilton Academical.
That matters in Pembrokeshire because Haverfordwest County AFC Ltd was only just taken to the High Court in London by HM Revenue & Customs. That case was dismissed, but only after reaching a live hearing, with costs ordered against the club.
Now another football-linked company in the same orbit is facing winding-up action in Scotland.
For Haverfordwest fans, the question is obvious: was the Bluebirds’ court case a one-off, or part of a bigger pattern around the same people and businesses?
A notice published in The Gazette states that a petition was presented at Hamilton Sheriff Court on April 2 seeking to wind up 1874 Holdings and appoint an interim liquidator. The petitioner is Zenith Legal Services Group Limited.
Hamilton has previously said that Morley Sports Management owns 100 per cent of 1874 Holdings, which in turn owns 97.5 per cent of Hamilton Academical FC.
The Scottish club’s latest statement does not deny the petition exists. Instead, it says the claim is disputed, says lawyers are dealing with it, and argues that a winding-up petition is not the right forum for the dispute.
That line is likely to sound familiar to many in west Wales.
During the Haverfordwest case, Rob Edwards described the HMRC petition as “a non-story”, said it related to “a VAT offset against PAYE that wasn’t recorded”, and insisted no debt was owed to HMRC.
But the Haverfordwest matter still remained live until it came before the High Court on April 15, where it was dismissed only after a hearing, with costs payable by the company.
That is why the latest Scottish petition is relevant here. It suggests the recent High Court case involving Haverfordwest may not have been an isolated scare, but part of a broader picture around the same football ownership circle.
There are also growing links between the two clubs at senior level. Earlier this month, Rebecca Nuttall was credited by Haverfordwest for key work behind the scenes in the club’s successful licensing process, while Hamilton also announced she had been appointed chief executive there in a dual role.
Hours after The Herald first reported the HMRC winding-up petition against Haverfordwest County A.F.C. Ltd, the club published a call for additional members to join its Board of Directors, saying it was entering “an exciting new chapter” and looking for commercially experienced people to help drive transition and growth.
Then, on April 8, Haverfordwest announced it had been awarded both its UEFA licence and FAW Tier 1 licence for the 2026-27 season, even though the HMRC petition was still live in the court system at that point and was not disposed of until a week later.
The Herald contacted the Football Association of Wales for comment last week, asking about the licensing position and the live HMRC petition, but no response had been received by the time of publication.
A petition is not the same as a winding-up order, and liquidation is not inevitable in the Hamilton case. But it is a serious legal step.
And when two football-linked companies in the same ownership network face winding-up petitions in the same month, supporters are entitled to ask hard questions.
News
Sandra Jervis warns Withybush is being stripped back by stealth
Lib Dem candidate says west Wales cannot afford to lose more hospital services as she attacks plans for centralisation
FEARS over the future of Withybush Hospital were thrown into sharp focus when Liberal Democrat Senedd candidate Sandra Jervis sat down with The Herald and accused the Welsh Government of allowing vital rural services to be eroded “by stealth”.
In a strongly worded interview, Jervis said people in Pembrokeshire were right to be alarmed by the steady loss of services at the Haverfordwest hospital, warning that the removal of emergency surgery was exactly the kind of move that fuels public suspicion that Withybush is being gradually run down.
She said: “We need hospitals in our locations.”
Jervis said the argument that services should be concentrated elsewhere was failing rural communities and ignoring the realities of living in west Wales, where longer journeys can have serious consequences for patients and families alike.
She also launched a fierce attack on the idea of a new central hospital for west Wales, describing it as wasteful and out of touch when existing hospitals are crying out for investment.
“I think it is the most ridiculous, ludicrous idea on this planet,” she said. “That money could be spent on investing in those hospitals and bringing them up to scratch, up to the modern standards that we deserve.”
Her comments come amid continuing anger over changes at Withybush and wider concern that Bronglais and other rural hospitals are being left to struggle while ministers and health chiefs talk increasingly about centralising services.
Jervis said the real problem was not that local hospitals were underperforming, but that they were being starved of the resources needed to do the job properly.
“They’re not underperforming. They’re under invested,” she said.
She argued that Pembrokeshire should not be expected to accept a second-rate service simply because it is rural, adding that emergency care and core hospital provision should be seen as basic standards, not optional extras.
The Lib Dem candidate also said the crisis in the NHS could not be solved without serious investment in social care, which she described as overlooked and undervalued for too long.
“Social care is severely under invested,” she said. “It is quite easily seen as the poor cousin to the NHS.”
Jervis said more support outside hospital would help free up beds, reduce backlogs and improve care for patients who no longer need to remain on wards.
Beyond health, she said west Wales faced deep-rooted economic problems, with local businesses being squeezed by rates, rising costs and lack of support, while young people were too often forced to leave the area in search of decent wages and better opportunities.
Speaking as a business owner, she said many traders felt they were being punished rather than backed.
“Everything feels like it is against you,” she said.
Jervis said town centres needed investment, business rates needed reform, and young people needed real reasons to build their lives in west Wales rather than move away.
On the environment, she said cleaning up polluted rivers and unlocking housing development had to go hand in hand, with tougher action against water companies and more urgency around delivering the homes communities need.
Asked why voters should back the Lib Dems, Jervis said the party had deep roots in west Wales and a record of challenging those in power.
“I take great pleasure in being a thorn in the side of other parties,” she said. “I can challenge, and I think that’s what we need.”
News
Drug dealer ordered to hand over Tesla shares worth just £91
Austin Hockey made more than £300,000 from supplying ecstasy, 2C-B and cannabis in Pembrokeshire, court hears
A DRUG dealer who made more than £300,000 from selling party drugs in Pembrokeshire has been ordered to hand over Tesla shares worth just £91.78.
Austin Hockey, 32, was the subject of a Proceeds of Crime Act hearing at Swansea Crown Court after previously being jailed for 40 months for drug offences.
The court heard Hockey had benefited from his criminal activity to the tune of £311,594 after supplying ecstasy, 2C-B and cannabis in Pembrokeshire between August 1 and December 2, 2023.
However, prosecutors accepted that the only realisable asset available to seize was a small holding of Tesla shares bought through the Trading 212 platform.
Judge Paul Thomas KC made a confiscation order in the sum of £91.78.
Hockey had previously admitted being concerned in the supply of ecstasy, 2C-B and cannabis, as well as possession with intent to supply all three drugs.
During his sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court, it was said that £171,180.60 had passed through his bank account during the period of the offending.
The court had already heard that Hockey, of Acresbush Close, Bishopsworth, Bristol, was arrested in December 2023.
When officers searched him, they found ecstasy and 2C-B tablets, along with 100 grams of cannabis. The drugs were said to have had a street value of £1,370.
Hockey claimed the drugs were for his own personal use and told police he had “borrowed” the cannabis.
But an examination of his mobile phone revealed extensive evidence of drug dealing, including messages advertising the supply of Class A and Class B drugs.
One message showed he was offering to supply any drug apart from heroin.
Prosecutor Matthew Murphy told the court that Hockey’s benefit from crime had been agreed at £311,594, but there were effectively no available assets beyond the Tesla shares.
At the earlier sentencing hearing, Hockey’s barrister Dan Griffiths said his client had begun using cannabis and alcohol at a young age and had been living a chaotic lifestyle at the time of his arrest.
-
Business5 days agoMilford Haven dry dock pitched as home for giant £480m superyacht yard
-
Community7 days agoDoorstep warning issued after reports of suspicious callers in Pembrokeshire
-
News6 days agoHaverfordwest County AFC escapes winding-up order but ordered to pay costs
-
Politics6 days agoWelsh Lib Dems promise childcare boost, social care reform in manifesto launch
-
News6 days agoLabour split over Brawdy defence project as Eluned Morgan calls for project halt
-
Crime6 days agoWoman who called for help spared jail over blade offence
-
Community6 days agoFamily safe after major house fire in Letterston, community told
-
Sport5 days agoLockwood handed first Six Nations start as Joyce returns for Arms Park test










