News
Wind turbine extension refused
PLANS to extend the height of a controversial wind turbine near Castle Cenlas, Mathry, were refused by the Planning and Rights of Way Committee.
The committee met on Tuesday, September 8, to discuss the application which had been recommended for approval by planning officers.
A previous application to the committee for the turbine was made in September 2014 but that was also refused by the committee.
However, the application was subsequently granted on appeal in March 2015.
The application before the committee sought to extend the height of the blade tip from 34.5m to 36.6m.
There were near farcical scenes when the vote was taken as at first the vote had been recorded as six for the application and seven against it.
The agent Martin Horne stood up in the public gallery demanding a recount of those who had voted but it was eventually clarified that six had voted for and seven had voted against.
Objecting as she did at the previous meeting, Annie Lock said: “My husband and I run a luxury camping and yurts business which is near where the turbine will be sited.
“Visitors come for the peace, tranquillity and landscape. We have been through the anxiety and stress of two other turbine applications by this applicant, both of which were refused by the planning committee.
“Over 150 people have objected to this amendment alone. This application is being presented to you as a minor change. This turbine will be over two metres higher and the blade sweep will be over 50% greater than the turbine which you have already turned down.
“The sweep, covering a 50% larger area, will have a devastating impact on the visual amenity and tranquillity of the area and our campsite.
“The recommendation to accept this turbine is just a gamble. Would you choose to go on holiday underneath a large turbine? You answered no to a smaller turbine last time.”
Cllr Brian Hall explained that as he had supported the turbine on the previous occasion he would do so again.
However, a number of councillors felt uncomfortable with the recommendation.
Cllr Peter Stock said: “I’ve always got great concern when we look at anything that could possibly affect the quality of Pembrokeshire.
“Visual impact is very important, and looking at Pembrokeshire now, we have many turbines up and this is possibly detrimental to the county.
“This particular one is higher than what we voted on last time and why when we turned it down before, are we being asked to approve this one?
“I believe that if we approve this today it will have a detrimental effect on that area.”
Cllr Tony Wilcox added: “This is a different application, this is larger and it would have a detrimental effect on the area and there are also two other turbines there so I am not comfortable with the officers’ recommendation.”
Cllr Gwilym Price said: “I can’t support approval here. I think the visual impact is absolutely devastating. I support the community council and the business in this area, tourism is so important to our county and we want to keep it looking as nice as possible. I hate to see too many turbines in an area so I will be voting against this.”
The plans to extend the turbine were refused but the developer still has the green light to go ahead with the existing consent.
Crime
Four youths stabbed at Tenby railway station as two arrested
British Transport Police lead investigation after serious disorder involving group of youths
FOUR youths suffered stab wounds during a major incident at Tenby railway station on Tuesday night (Apr 7), police have confirmed.
Emergency services were called to reports of serious disorder involving a group of youths at around 9:50pm. The Herald was at the scene as a major response unfolded, with at least four ambulances and around 15 police cars and vans sent to the area.
Video circulating on social media appeared to show a number of children involved in a fracas on the railway platform. In footage seen by The Herald, at least one youth could be heard saying he had been stabbed.

In a statement issued shortly after midnight, a Dyfed-Powys Police spokesperson said: “Dyfed-Powys Police were called to reports of serious disorder involving a group of youths at Tenby train station at approx. 9.50pm this evening (Tuesday, April 7). During the incident, an individual was in possession of a knife, which resulted in four youths sustaining stab wounds.”
Police said all injuries are currently assessed as non-life-threatening and those affected are receiving appropriate medical treatment.
Officers attended the scene promptly and a 16-year-old youth and a 19-year-old man were arrested on suspicion of Section 18 assault. Both remain in police custody.
Dyfed-Powys Police said British Transport Police have primacy for the incident and are leading enquiries.
The force added that the incident has now been brought under control and that the scene is secure. There will remain an increased police presence in the area to provide reassurance.
Anyone who witnessed the incident or has information that could help the enquiry is asked to contact British Transport Police online, call 0800 40 50 40, or contact Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555111.
News
Major emergency response in Tenby after incident near train station
Witnesses report injuries as police and ambulance crews remain at scene on Warren Street
POLICE and ambulance crews remain at the scene of a major incident in Tenby tonight.
The incident is understood to have taken place at around 9:30pm on Tuesday (Apr 7) near Tenby railway station. This picture was taken from Warren Street looking towards the station.
Witnesses reported seeing around 15 police cars and vans at the scene, along with multiple ambulances. Emergency vehicles were still arriving as of 10:30pm.
A witness told The Herald that a number of young people were involved and that some people appeared to have been injured following the incident.
There has not yet been any official confirmation from the emergency services about the nature of the injuries or exactly what happened.
However, the scale of the response suggests the incident is serious.
The Herald has contacted the police for comment.
News
White House defends Trump after Herald asks about Iran remarks
US response fails to answer legal question over threats to bridges, power stations and desalination plants
THE WHITE HOUSE has defended President Donald Trump after The Pembrokeshire Herald asked whether international law would constrain any US military action following his remarks about bombing bridges, power stations and desalination plants in Iran.
In response to a question sent by this newspaper on Friday (Apr 3), a White House Press Office spokeswoman issued a strongly worded statement attacking the Iranian regime, but did not directly address the legal point raised by The Herald.
She said: “The Iranian regime has committed egregious human rights abuses against its own citizens for 47 years, just murdered tens of thousands of protestors in January, and has indiscriminately targeted civilians across the region in order to cause as much death as possible throughout this conflict.
“As President Trump said, Iran can never have a nuclear weapon, and the Iranian people welcome the sound of bombs because it means their oppressors are losing.
“The President will always stand with innocent civilians while annihilating the terrorists responsible for threatening our country and the entire world with a nuclear weapon. Greater destruction can be avoided if the regime understands the seriousness of this moment and makes a deal with the United States.”
The Herald had asked whether the President believed international humanitarian law continued to apply in light of protections for civilian infrastructure and facilities essential to civilian survival.
The newspaper also asked the White House to set out the legal basis on which such threats or actions would be considered lawful.
No direct legal justification was provided in the response.
Instead, the White House framed the issue as part of a wider effort to pressure Iran over its nuclear ambitions and its conduct in the region.
The exchange follows President Trump’s public remarks about striking key Iranian infrastructure, which have prompted wider scrutiny over whether such targets would be lawful under the rules of armed conflict.
The White House statement, however, offered no further explanation of how threats against bridges, power stations or desalination plants could be reconciled with international legal protections for civilian sites.
That omission is likely to fuel further questions over the administration’s position, particularly as tensions continue to rise.
-
News5 days agoAccommodation providers in Wales will be required to register under new law
-
Entertainment5 days agoFrom Milford Haven to the world: The story of The Evolution Experience
-
Entertainment6 days agoBBC unveils major new Welsh dramas with Tenby set for prime-time spotlight
-
News7 days agoHealth minister refuses to act on Withybush despite 15,000-signature petition
-
Community6 days agoSycamore Gap legacy takes root at Carew Castle
-
Crime6 days agoDriver spared jail after crash killed young couple
-
Business6 days agoFire damaged Newgale Duke of Edinburgh Inn plans refused
-
News3 days agoEluned Morgan targets Haverfordwest as Welsh Labour fights to hold its ground










