News
Student slams council behaviour

Conduct complaints: Jamie Adams
THE CONDUCT of Council Leader Jamie Adams during debates has again been the subject of complaints by members of the public.
In its report of the meeting held on January 29, The Herald reported how one outraged parent in the public gallery said: “If a pupil behaved like that it would be seen as disruptive behaviour. What sort of message does head-shaking, smirking and sighing theatrically when someone says something you disagree with, give kids about the appropriate way to behave?”
It seems as though Cllr Adams remains incapable of controlling himself when views contrary to his own are expressed. In a letter to Council Chair Tom Richards, Millie Thomas, Deputy Head Girl of Tasker-Milward School relates how she, too, witnessed Jamie Adams’ shenanigans during the debate held on Tuesday April 14, where the council debated Cllr Paul Miller’s motion to cease the ongoing controversial consultation on post 16 education.
The letter states that: “As a member of the Sixth Form in Tasker-Milward I was very disappointed to see the behaviour of several members in the meeting.”
Drawing attention to the conduct of Cllr Sue Perkins, Millie addresses Cllr Perkins’ claim made in the Chamber that she ‘listened to all of the other councillors when they spoke’.
The letter goes on to say, “Cllr Perkins did listen to all of the councillors: unfortunately manners truly are not Cllr Perkin’s strong point. Throughout everybody speaking in favour of the motion Cllr Perkins sat there whilst shaking her head continuously. Now, as a 17 year old student, if I know that is disrespectful I believe she should understand that too. Cllr Perkins is obviously heavily involved in the changes in education and I find it very disrespectful in the way she presented herself that day.”
Highlighting the conduct of both Cllr Perkins and Jamie Adams, as people spoke about their feelings on the motion, Millie states: “(They) were fairly far away from one another in the chamber, leaning back far in their chairs to pull faces at one another about what other Councillors were saying. I’m not completely sure what they were shouting at each other because I was far away, but obviously it was negative and again disrespectful.”
Noting that some councillors appeared more equal than others, the Deputy Head Girl’s letter goes on to note that the cut off time for five minutes was disregarded for some councillors but not for others. Addressing Cllr Richards directly, she writes: “As Chair of the council I believe it is up to you to not seem biased towards some more than others. Cllr Jamie Adams and Cllr Susan Perkins spoke a lot more than others and this is not fair. I think their behaviour needs to be addressed, manners cost nothing and they need to be respectful like everyone listening to their opinions. They acted very immaturely and disrespectfully and I hope that in the future this is addressed in the chamber, in County Hall.”
Millie concludes by saying: “I do hope their behaviour is acted on or addressed.”
The Herald invited Cllrs Richards, Perkins and Adams to respond to Millie Thomas’ letter.
A council spokesperson told us: “Council Chairman Cllr Tom Richards has been away. He will be responding by letter to Millie as soon as his schedule allows.”
Cllr Jamie Adams responded to Millie, saying: “Thank you for copying me in to your email to Cllr Richards.
“I am disappointed by your comments and will review the webcast to reflect upon my demeanour at the meeting. As for timing, again I will review the matter in the same way and form a view on the time allocated to myself and others. I would just add that the Council Chamber is a dynamic environment as you’ve witnessed where strength of opinion and emotion can often be reflected in many ways. The viewing gallery does not give you a panoramic view of the expressions and gestures of all members. Thank you again for expressing your views.”
Cllr Sue Perkins told us: “I haven’t had any direct contact from Millie, but I’m more than happy to respond personally to her on any of the points she has raised if she’d like to get in touch with me directly. I’m very glad that she and so many other young people in Pembrokeshire are participating in the consultation and look forward to receiving as many views as possible before the process ends on May 5.”
Local Government
Mayor visits Milford Haven Library Christmas event
THE MAYOR of Milford Haven, Cllr William Elliott, paid a visit to Milford Haven Library on Tuesday morning to attend its festive Mince Pie and a Cuppa event.
The event brought together library staff and local residents, with the Mayor thanking staff for their work supporting the community throughout the year. During the visit, Cllr Elliott also spent time speaking with residents who had come along to the event or were visiting the library to borrow books.
Milford Haven Library is part of the Pembrokeshire Libraries service, which provides access to books, information, and community activities across the county.
The Mayor wished residents a Merry Christmas at the close of his visit.
Crime
Milford Haven man jailed after drunken attack on partner and police officers
A MILFORD HAVEN man who launched a violent drunken assault on his partner before attacking two police officers has been jailed for three years and six months.
Alexander Campbell was sentenced on Wednesday (Dec 16) at Swansea Crown Court after admitting causing grievous bodily harm and two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm.
The court heard that Campbell had been in a relationship with his partner, Miss Cox, for six years. On the night of the offence, he returned home highly intoxicated and became argumentative.

Prosecutor Rieve Nesbitt-Marr told the court that Miss Cox advised Campbell to go upstairs and sleep off the alcohol. Instead, he began poking her and told her not to tell him what to do.
Campbell then launched what Miss Cox described as “a flurry of punches that rained down on her.”
Neighbours contacted police after hearing the disturbance. When officers arrived, they found a smashed bowl on the floor and Miss Cox lying on the sofa under a blanket, covering her face.
Body-worn camera footage played in court showed Campbell threatening officers, telling them: “I will turn this place into a f***ing murder scene.”
As officers attempted to separate the parties, PC Thomas placed her arm out to create distance. Campbell grabbed her wrist with force, an assault captured on body-worn video.
He then attacked PC Jones, climbing on top of him and punching him repeatedly, again recorded on police body-worn footage.
PC Thomas later attended Withybush Hospital, where she received four stitches under local anaesthetic. Miss Cox suffered severe facial bruising, with one eye swollen almost shut.
The court was told that Miss Cox’s ten-year-old daughter was upstairs at the property during the incident.
Campbell has 27 previous offences. In mitigation, the court heard that he accepted alcohol turned him into a different person, telling the court: “I’m an ugly person when I drink. I’m a different person when I’m sober.”
Sentencing Campbell, the judge said he knew better than anyone how alcohol affected him.
“You came home in a bad mood and almost predictively, you assaulted her,” the judge said.
“The noise and aggression was such that the neighbour called the police.”
“You gave her a bruise on her face that can only be described as a large shiner.”
“In short, you have injured three people. Your conduct was utterly pathetic, like an overgrown child.”
The judge also referred to Campbell’s violent history, describing him as a “cowardly bully.”
While acknowledging that Campbell had previously complied well with a suspended sentence after removing his own alcohol tag, the judge said custody was unavoidable.
Campbell was sentenced to three years and six months in prison, with half to be served in custody and the remainder on licence.
Warning him about his future, the judge added: “If you carry on with this behaviour you will spend a lifetime in prison. The only person who can change this is you.”
The court also granted a restraining order for five years.
News
Automatic voter registration pilots add over 16,000 people to electoral roll in Wales
MORE than 16,000 people were added to the electoral register during the UK’s first Automatic Voter Registration (AVR) pilots, according to results published this week by the Electoral Commission.
The pilots were carried out in Gwynedd, Newport and Powys, with a fourth, desk-based exercise taking place in Carmarthenshire. They were launched by the Welsh Government in 2024 under powers granted by the Elections and Elected Bodies (Wales) Act 2024.
Under the scheme, local authorities used existing public records – including council tax and education data – to identify and add eligible voters to the electoral register without requiring them to submit an individual application.
Electoral reform programme
The pilots form part of a wider programme of electoral reform in Wales, which has already seen the introduction of votes at 16 for Senedd and local elections, alongside efforts to improve accessibility and participation.
The Electoral Commission said the pilots demonstrated that barriers to registration could be reduced using data already held by public bodies, and that large numbers of people who would otherwise remain unregistered could be enfranchised through automated processes.
Although four local authorities were involved overall, only three pilots resulted in people being directly added to the register. Carmarthenshire participated through a data-matching exercise rather than live registration.
Wider UK implications
The findings have significance beyond Wales. The UK Government has already signalled its intention to introduce automated voter registration across England and the rest of the UK as part of future electoral legislation.
The Electoral Commission estimates that more than eight million people across the UK are currently not registered to vote. Concerns have been raised in recent years that Britain has one of the most complex voter registration systems among established democracies.
Supporters of AVR argue that using trusted public datasets could significantly reduce under-registration, particularly among young people, renters and those who move frequently.
Calls for expansion
Jess Blair, Director of ERS Cymru, said the pilots showed automatic registration was both effective and scalable.
She said: “These Automatic Voter Registration pilots have added over 16,000 previously unregistered potential voters to the electoral register in just three local areas. It proves that AVR works and should be in place across Wales for future elections.
“It makes life easier and simpler for voters and could help reduce the barriers thousands of people across the country face in playing an active part in our democracy.”
Ms Blair said the results also highlighted the potential impact of a UK-wide scheme.
“The fact that over 16,000 people were added in just three areas using only local authority data means the potential for AVR at a UK level, using more comprehensive national datasets, is huge,” she said.
Timing concerns
Despite the positive results, automatic voter registration will not be in place for the next Senedd elections in May 2026.
ERS Cymru said it was disappointed by the timescale and urged the next Welsh Government to move quickly to ensure the system is operational for local elections in 2027.
With the UK Government expected to bring forward legislation on electoral reform, campaigners say the Welsh pilots provide a clear model for reducing registration barriers and increasing democratic participation nationwide.
-
Crime7 days agoKilgetty scaffolder sentenced after driving with cocaine and in system
-
News3 days agoDyfed-Powys Police launch major investigation after triple fatal crash
-
Crime2 days agoMan sent to Crown Court over historic indecent assault allegations
-
Crime7 days agoMotorist banned for three years after driving with cannabis in system
-
Crime4 days agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven
-
Education6 days agoTeaching assistant struck off after asking pupil for photos of her body
-
Crime2 days agoMilford Haven man admits multiple offences after A477 incident
-
Crime1 day agoRape allegation investigated at Saundersfoot nightclub










Ieuan
May 8, 2015 at 7:47 pm
Well Written by Millie unfortunalty this will fall on deaf ears!
These people have no respect for others.
However this young Lady will go far, well tuned to what is going on, respect to Millie
Flashbang
May 9, 2015 at 7:54 am
I’m glad you can see through the emperor and his new clothes, pity his idiot IPPG can’t or wont. They are denying the people of the county the right to proper representation.
tomos
May 11, 2015 at 7:23 pm
sue perkins is really beging to make a name for herself isn’t she?
Not quite sure what the name is but possibly she wants to be the next leader of IPiG
Millie
May 11, 2015 at 11:49 pm
thank you for your kind comments, I really do hope the people who are supposed to be representing us buck up their ideas and attitudes!
Martyn
May 8, 2017 at 4:23 pm
Dynamic is Not how I would describe Jamie Adams
David Jones
May 8, 2017 at 11:19 pm
Jamie is a good man. I’ve known him for thirty years he has done a good job in the council. A family man and a great uncle to my children
Jamie Pearce
May 9, 2017 at 7:46 am
@David Jones, totally irrelevant to the point the young lady was making!