Farming
Glyphosate approval delayed again
A PLANNED vote on the future of the world’s most widely used herbicide in the European Union has been delayed again in light of persistent concerns over its safety.
Member state representatives on the European Council’s Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed were set t o vote on reapproval terms for glyphosate, the current license for which expires in June.
This follows the first postponement in March, when member state ministers were expected to wave through the Commission’s plans to relicense glyphosate for 15 years. However, ahead of the vote France’s environment minister Segolene Royale announced that the French government would vote against approval. This was followed by statements from the governments of Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Sweden declaring that they would vote against reauthorisation unless the vote was postponed until health concerns had been cleared up.
WHO CONCERNS
Last year, the World Health Organisation’s cancer research arm IARC classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. Later in the year, Commission watchdog EFSA released an opinion in which it stated glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic and recommended increasing the threshold for glyphosate residues in the EU.
This sparked a spat between scientists from the two organisations and led to scrutiny of EFSA’s work – which looked at the glyphosate compound in isolation, whereas IARC examined glyphosate products in solutions, as they are found on the market – and led to calls for greater transparency from the watchdog.
On Thursday, French minister Segolene Royale said in a statement: “In accordance with my announcement of March 4, France remains opposed to the re-approval of glyphosate for the market for 9 years.”
Royale continued: “I have been in contact with my counterparts in other European countries. The ministers for other countries, notably Germany, Italy, Sweden, Austria and Portugal have indicated they would vote against the Commission’s proposal or abstain.”
The French environment minister said France had taken its stance in light of the IARC findings on glyphosate. France has banned the sale of glyphosate to non-professionals and stopped its use in parks and public spaces.
Germany had said it would abstain in voting because the country’s farm and environment ministers belong to different parties, with different views on the debate, and no common position could be reached.
NO CONSENSUS
The revised proposal put up for debate by the Commission, following a vote in the European Parliament last month, was abandoned on Thursday after the EU executive failed to secure the required majority among EU governments.
Parliamentarians who had seen the proposal were highly critical of the Commission’s plans, which they said failed to acknowledge the ongoing concerns about glyphosate’s safety or MEPs’ resolution of last month agreeing that sales of the herbicide should be restricted to professional users only, and that the practice of using glyphosate as a desiccant on crops before harvest should be banned.
However, according to EU sources, the Commission’s revised proposal would have banned some coformulants, which evidence suggests increases any health risks associated with glyphosate.
Commenting on the development on Thursday, EU Greens’ environment and food safety spokesperson Bart Staes said: “This latest postponement is a sign that the significant opposition to reapproving glyphosate is being taken seriously by key EU governments. It is clear that the EU Commission and the agro-chemical industry were hell-bent on bulldozing through the approval of glyphosate for unrestricted use for a long timeframe but thankfully this push has been headed off for now.
“We hope this postponement will convince more EU governments to join in opposing the approval of this controversial substance and, at the very least, to proactively propose comprehensive restrictions on its use.
“The Commission cannot keep coming back with proposals that do not address the concerns with glyphosate. Instead, it needs to finally recognise that there are major problems and legislate for this.
“Only last month, the European Parliament voted to highlight its concerns with glyphosate and adopted a resolution opposing approval of glyphosate for most of its uses. MEPs voted to oppose the approval of glyphosate in agriculture where there are alternative methods for weed control, in the pre-harvest stage, in public parks and playgrounds and for hobby gardeners.
“EU governments should now take this on board both in terms of the pending EU approval but also at national level, where member states can introduce their own bans or restrictions, as France has already indicated it will do.”
Staes, who is MEP for Flanders in Belgium, added: While the agrochemical lobby is desperately trying to spin it otherwise, the finding by the WHO’S IARC that glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans is of major concern. This, combined with the established negative impacts on the environment, should be leading to a global moratorium on its use.”
UK FARMERS ‘EXASPERATED’
Responding late on Thursday, NFU Vice President Guy Smith said: “Like most farmers who use glyphosate regularly, I am nothing short of exasperated as to why this key herbicide cannot simply and quickly be given the reauthorisation that has been recommended by EFSA – the appropriate EU scientific body.
Some member states in the committee are prevaricating and wasting time when they could be taking decisions based on scientific evidence.
Glyphosate is a pesticide which allows farmers to combat weeds while supporting cultivation methods that can preserve good soil structure. There is no sense behind this delay and we look to Member States to support an evidence-based, full re-approval at the earliest possible opportunity.”
In their resolution last month, MEPs appealed to the Commission to err on the side of caution and abide by the precautionary principle in its decision making; in theory, the scientific principle underpins EU environment and public health legislation.
It now remains to be seen whether a vote will take place in the coming weeks or whether the European Commission will be required to cast the deciding vote.
Business
Award-winning Herbrandston holiday site set to expand
PLANS to expand a Pembrokeshire holiday operation which was voted as the best of its type in the UK by the Caravan Club in its very first year of operation have been given the go-ahead.
In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, Dean and Sharon Philpin sought permission to expand the existing holiday operation at Woody Kiln Farm, Herbrandston Village, Herbrandston by converting a former agricultural barn to four short-term holiday lets.
A supporting statement through agent Hayston Developments & Planning Ltd said: “Woody Kiln Farm is located to the east of Herbrandston village, to the south easterly side of Havens Park residential estate. It is a registered agricultural holding, and the land is used mainly for the raising and grazing of sheep covering 12 / 13 acres.

“The farm complex comprises of a number of traditional outbuildings and the applicants main dwelling surrounding a surfaced courtyard. Immediately to the south is a caravan site registered with the Caravan & Motorhome Club as a Certificated Location for up to five touring caravans and motorhomes.
“This Certificated Location has been in operation for 10 years and was the first ever site to be voted the best site in UK on its first year of operating by its members. In recent years it was voted best site in Wales.”
The site has won many similar Certificated Location awards.
It went on to say: “The application proposal relates to a total of three barns that integrate into one building footprint. It is intended to reuse the barns and provide four short-term holiday let units that will be run in conjunction with our client’s current Caravan Club site, situated immediately to the east of the barns.”
It was described as: “A sympathetic design that incorporates no change to the footprint or roof design and little change to the fenestration is the main theme of the design strategy.”
An officer report recommending approval, subject to conditions including a unilateral undertaking to provide a contribution to affordable housing said: “Strategic Policy have advised that the scale and layout of the units could lend themselves to residential use and that an affordable housing contribution may be required.
“Whilst the proposed use is short-term holiday let given that the properties are capable of use as full residential properties, it is proposed that a full unfettered residential permission be granted, with no condition for holiday let-only, meaning that the property could be used for full residential use or second home use.”
Based on current affordable housing contributions, that amounted to £26,170, the report said.
The application was conditionally approved, conditions including the affordable housing element.
Farming
Rural crime cost Wales more than £2m last year, NFU Mutual report reveals
WALES saw the cost of rural crime fall by 21 per cent last year, but farmers are being warned not to become complacent after a rise in tractor and livestock thefts.
New figures from NFU Mutual show rural crime cost Wales an estimated £2.2m in 2025, down from £2.8m the previous year.
The fall mirrors the UK-wide picture, with the total cost of rural crime across the UK dropping from £44.1m in 2024 to £41.5m in 2025.
NFU Mutual said the reduction showed the impact of investment, police work and closer collaboration between farmers, insurers and rural crime teams. However, the insurer warned that organised criminals continue to target the countryside for high-value farm machinery, livestock and equipment.
In Wales, the cost of agricultural vehicle theft rose by six per cent, with criminals targeting tractors across the country. Livestock theft also increased by almost seven per cent compared with 2024.
NFU Mutual said the rise was particularly concerning in Wales, where livestock farming plays a central role in the rural economy and food production.
The company said rural crime remained a serious issue for farming communities, not only because of the financial loss but because of the emotional impact on farmers and their families.
Nick Turner, Chief Executive of NFU Mutual, said: “For more than 20 years, NFU Mutual has called for a stronger response to rural crime, and we know the financial and emotional toll it takes on farmers.
“As a mutual, our support goes beyond paying claims: last year we invested over £500,000 in rural crime initiatives, including ongoing funding for the National Rural Crime Unit and the UK’s first dedicated livestock theft officer.
“We also collaborate with the unit to identify at-risk areas and support recovery efforts.
“In addition, we worked with local police forces to install 13 ANPR cameras across rural hotspots in England and Wales to track suspicious vehicles and disrupt criminal activity.”
Hannah Binns, Rural Affairs Specialist at NFU Mutual, said rural crime was becoming increasingly organised.
She said: “Rural crime is more organised than ever, with criminals prepared to go to extreme lengths, and 2025 proved no exception.
“Yet targeted investment in rural crime initiatives alongside industry collaboration with law enforcement is helping drive down crime, with our latest figures highlighting a 21 per cent fall year-on-year in Wales, to an estimated £2.2m.
“The impact of rural crime extends beyond financial loss, undermining trust and connection, often leaving a trauma that can remain with farmers, their families and wider communities for a lifetime.
“But we cannot afford to be complacent. With proposed policing reforms on the horizon, it is crucial rural crime teams receive fair resources and specialist support to empower local forces to respond quickly to countryside incidents caused by organised and serious criminals.”
Across the UK, the highest rural crime cost was recorded in the North East at £7.6m, followed by the South East at £6.8m, the Midlands at £6.4m and the South West at £6.2m.
Wales recorded the joint-lowest estimated cost alongside Northern Ireland, although Northern Ireland saw a 24 per cent increase.
A survey of 119 NFU Mutual agents found that 91 per cent believed rural crime was disrupting farming in their area, while 79 per cent knew farmers who had been targeted repeatedly.
Almost a third said they had seen farmers change practices or leave the industry altogether because of rural crime.
NFU Mutual said the figures were based on claims statistics rounded to the nearest £100,000.
Farming
Badger Trust urges new Welsh Government to reject cull
Polling shows strong public opposition to killing badgers in Wales
BADGER Trust is calling on Wales’ incoming government to rule out badger culling, after new polling suggested widespread public opposition to killing badgers as part of efforts to tackle bovine TB.
The call comes as a newly expanded Senedd begins its work and a new Welsh Government prepares to set out its priorities.
Badger Trust said ministers and political parties should reject calls for culling and instead focus on “evidence-led cattle measures” to control the disease.
Polling carried out by RSPCA Cymru found that only 27% of people in Wales support badger culling, while 46% are opposed. The survey also found that 63% of respondents were uncomfortable with killing badgers, and 68% opposed the use of public money to fund culling.
The organisation said the figures showed bovine TB was likely to remain one of the most significant animal welfare issues facing Wales in the coming years.
As Plaid Cymru prepares to form a minority government, with Rhun ap Iorwerth MS expected to become Wales’ new First Minister, Badger Trust is urging all parties to take note of public feeling on the issue.
More than half of those surveyed, 51.8%, said they would be less likely to support a political party that backs badger culling, compared with just 7.2% who said they would be more likely to do so.
The poll also found strong support for wildlife protection, with 98% of respondents describing it as important and 69% saying it was “very important”. Around 73% said they were concerned about badger welfare, while 53.8% described badgers as iconic British mammals and 43.5% said they were heavily misunderstood.
Nigel Palmer, chief executive of Badger Trust, said: “The people of Wales have spoken loud and clear: badger culling is a vote loser for the new government.
“It’s clear how much the people of Wales value their badgers as an integral part of their landscape. This underlines the fact that badgers belong here.”
Mr Palmer said Wales should learn from what he described as “politically driven mistakes” in England, where more than 250,000 badgers have been culled over the past 13 years.
He said: “Farmers need support to tackle bovine TB where the infections arise — within the national cattle population, particularly in the larger herds.
“The answer lies in evidence-based cattle measures, delivered in partnership with vets and farmers, not in the unnecessary killing of wildlife.”
Badger Trust said Wales had already shown that bovine TB could be reduced in cattle without killing badgers, through science-led cattle measures aimed at tackling the disease more effectively and humanely.
The charity said the message from the Welsh public was clear, and that Wales should not follow England “down the path of badger culling”.
Badger Trust said: “It’s time to end the badger blame game. The science is solid, and the public has voiced its opinion; now it is time for the new government to listen and act accordingly.”
Badger Trust is the leading voice for badgers across England and Wales and works with local badger groups through its Badgers Belong Here campaign.
-
Health6 days agoPaul Davies warns health board over Withybush and Bronglais services
-
Crime7 days agoPolice tip-off leads to drink-drive ban for Pembrokeshire pensioner
-
Crime6 days agoCarmarthenshire man sent to Crown accused of 33 historic sexual offences
-
Crime7 days agoSteynton motorist banned after drink-drive collision
-
Crime7 days agoWarrant issued for man accused of taking wild goldfinches
-
Crime7 days agoDock man given suspended prison sentence for third drink-drive offence
-
Crime7 days agoDock motorist fined £1,600 after four speeding offences
-
Crime7 days agoTree surgeon denies drink-driving charge








