Business
1 Stop directors made millions
THE PEMBROKESHIRE HERALD can reveal that 1 Stop Financial Services directors Timothy Hughes and Andrew Rees obtained massive incomes while mis-selling pensions products to nearly 2,000 customers across the UK.
Mr Hughes’ total declared income received during the period October 2010 to November 2012 was £1,511,846, while Mr Rees benefited to the tune of £1,181,437 at the same time.
After obtaining further information from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Pembrokeshire Herald is able to expand and clarify its article concerning the activities of Haverfordwest financial advisors Tim Hughes and Andrew Rees, who formerly traded as 1 Stop Financial Services.
The Herald can reveal that, while the pair were cleared of dishonesty by the FCA, elements of the conduct that led to the pair being ordered to pay penalties to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the region of £500,000, are capable of being construed as sharp practice.
In particular, the FCA highlights how the pair managed to rake off referral fees for themselves from a separate and unregulated company, EGI, of which they were both directors and shareholders.
Mr Rees and Mr Hughes not only obtained commission as introducers of business but fees from their customers in the region of £3,000 a time.
This receipt of financial benefit created a conflict of interest, as 1 Stop advised customers to transfer their pensions into a SIPP in order to purchase an underlying investment when Mr Rees and Mr Hughes had also a financial interest in facilitating the sale of that investment to the customer (through EGI). However, the pair failed to disclose, manage and mitigate adequately this conflict of interest.
Even when a declaration was placed into customer documentation recording the link between 1 Stop and EGI, it failed to mention the financial interest of Mr Rees or Mr Hughes in EGI.
As a result of their actions, 1,959 of 1 Stop’s customers were at risk of having invested a total of £112,331,229, mostly from pension funds including some final salary schemes, into SIPPs which may not have been suitable for them.
The FCA also found that customers’ wishes to securely invest their pension savings in secure products were ignored and risky investments entered into instead. In the case of one customer who wished to adopt a low-risk strategy, their final salary pension fund was channeled into an unsuitable and very risky investment.
In addition, customers including a joiner, builder and a publican were all certified by Messrs Rees and Hughes as having a high level of understanding of risky “wrapper-type” investments involving complex property transactions. The FCA did not believe the records created by 1 Stop in this regard.
49% of those customers affected were encourage to invest in overseas property developments operated by Harlequin Properties. None of those customers received any advice from 1 Stop on the suitability of that overseas property investment.
The Harlequin group of companies are engaged in the development and distribution of overseas property investments and resorts.
On January 18, 2013, the FCA issued an alert to financial advisers about investments in overseas properties bought through Harlequin Property. In March, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that it, together with Essex Police, was looking into complaints in relation to the Harlequin group. Investors who have invested in specific resorts were asked to contact the SFO.
On May 3, 2013 administrators were appointed for Harlequin Properties.
1 Stop customers who invested in risky investments on the advice of Mr Rees and Mr Hughes have been placed at significant risk of potentially losing all of their money.
In light of their personal liability for the negligent and incorrect advice tendered to their customers, Mr Rees and Mr Hughes were both banned from performing any significant influence function in relation to any regulated activity, carried on by any authorised person, exempt person or exempt professional firm.
In both cases, the FCA decided to impose that penalty neither Mr Rees nor Mr Hughes were judged a fit and proper person in terms of competence and capability.
Harlequin Property are the primary agent for Harlequin Hotels and Resorts, who they say create luxury five star resorts in various locations across the Caribbean. Their mission statement is to,
‘deliver excellent long term returns on clients’ investment by selecting property developments in the most desirable locations’.
The Serious Fraud Office told The Herald that: “The SFO, together with Essex Police, continues to investigate the Harlequin group of companies. We are not able to comment on the on-going investigation nor are we able to comment on an individual’s particular investment.”
In 2013 Harlequin were caught up in a mortgage scandal that saw investors in their properties put at risk of losing around £400 million of deposits.
Investors in Harlequin’s various property ventures and hotel resorts were required to pay a deposit of 30% of their property’s price to secure their investment. Where investors needed to take out a mortgage to pay for the remaining 70% of the property purchase, Harlequin offered to provide a loan which the investors could pay back upon completion.
However, investors were then asked to find around £157,150 each to pay for the properties without the aid of Harlequin’s ‘value guaranteed mortgage’.
Gareth Fatchett, partner at Regulatory Legal speaking in New Model Advisor, said, “Only 2% or respondents could complete without a mortgage, which means 98% of people will go into breach of contract, and Harlequin is saying if they don’t complete their payment they’ll lose their deposit. Advisers should have known from the outset there was not a mortgage available. I’d go so far as to say we’ve seen no evidence of a mortgage relating to a Harlequin property. I suspect the 10% or 15% commissions may have made advisers not check. It’s a huge mis-selling [scandal]. Advisers knew the people they were taking into these contracts couldn’t afford to complete, so therefore the mortgage was by far the most vital thing.”
Business
Salon plans for Haverfordwest car valet site approved
RETROSPECTIVE plans to change a Pembrokeshire car sales/valet area to include a barber shop and tanning salon have been given the go-ahead.
In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Zizo Barbers & Affordable Cars, of Cambrian Place, Haverfordwest sought permission for the change of use of previously granted valet and car sales area, the works completed in 2024.
A supporting statement through agent Hayston Developments & Planning Ltd said the former commercial garage business has been operating in several guises from the premises for many years and has included petrol sales, motor servicing and repairs, MoTs, vehicle valeting, car sales and customer parking.
This followed on from a 2011 permission for the partial demolition of the original commercial garage, with a later approval for the site refurbishment to provide a workshop, valeting and offices for the existing car sales.
A supporting statement said: “The proposed update to a change of use involves the replacement of a car valeting service, which took place under a covered area at the rear of the site by a wash and valet operation – and restricting this service to those cars being sold at the Cambrian Place site. The use of a former office / store as a barber shop.
“The use of the former customer waiting area as a tanning salon including a new moveable timber shed for use as a meet and greet facility and as a car sales office. Provision of a communal parking area. Whilst retaining the principal use of the site for the sale of used cars.
“It is therefore suggested that the proposal will reduce both the elements of noise and the generation of dust whilst improving air quality as substantially fewer cars being power washed and valeted as well as the visual impact of these activities in this very public location – and with adjacent residential properties.”
Haverfordwest Town Council had objected to the scheme on highway safety grounds, but an officer report recommending approval said: “Highways colleagues have advised that the mixed use at the site is not likely to generate a significant number of trips that would lead to congestion and/or road safety issues due to the hours of operation are suggestive of visitors in the non-peak hours over the course of the day.
“In addition, highways colleagues have confirmed recorded accident history is negligible at the site, with one accident in 2023 at the nearby junction as a result of a rear shunt.”
It also said that, as the site lies adjacent to the A40(T) Welsh Government as a highway authority were consulted on the application, but has not not issued a direction in respect of this application.
One letter of objection had also raised issues of traffic and highway safety, chemical and detergent waste from the site and occasional activity after 5pm.
The report said the cessation of the valeting/washing use will reduce water usage at the site and any activity outside normal hours was an enforcement matter.
The application was conditionally approved by officers.
Business
Community council objections to Tenby Lidl store scheme
PLANS for a new store on the edge of Tenby by retail giant Lidl, which has seen objections from the local community council, are likely to be heard next year.
In an application recently lodged with Pembrokeshire County Council back in October, Lidl GB Ltd, through agent CarneySweeney, seeks permission for a new 1,969sqm store on land at Park House Court, Narberth Road, New Hedges/Tenby, to the north of the Park Court Nursing Home.
The proposals for the latest specification Lidl store, which includes 103 parking spaces, would create 40 jobs, the applicants say.
The application follows draft proposals submitted in 2024 and public consultations on the scheme, with a leaflet drop delivered to 8,605 local properties; an information website, with online feedback form; and a public exhibition, held last December at the De Valence Pavillion in Tenby, with a follow-up community event held at New Hedges Village Hall, close to the site, publicised through an additional postcard issued to 2,060 properties.

Some 1,365 responses have been received, with 89 per cent of respondents expressing support for the proposals, the applicants say.
A supporting statement says: “Lidl is now exceptionally well established in the UK with the Company operating c.980 stores from sites and premises both within and outside town centres. Its market share continues to increase substantially, and the company is expanding its store network considerably. The UK operational model is based firmly on the success of Lidl’s operations abroad with more than 10,800 stores trading across Europe.
It adds: “The granting of planning permission for the erection of a new Lidl food store would increase the retail offer and boost the local economy. The new Lidl food store would create up to 40 employment opportunities for people of all ages and backgrounds, providing opportunities for training and career development. This in turn will create an upward spiral of economic benefits.”
Local community council St Mary Out Liberty Community Council has formally objected to the scheme, saying that, while it supports the scheme for a Lidl store in principle, recognising “the economic benefits a new retail store could bring,” it says the proposed location “is unsuitable, conflicts with planning policy, and cannot be supported in its current form”.
Its objections add: “The A478 is heavily congested in peak tourist months. A supermarket would worsen congestion, increase turning movements, and heighten risks to pedestrians, cyclists, and emergency access.”
It also raises concerns on the potential impact through “noise, lighting, traffic disturbance, and loss of quiet amenity” on a neighbouring residential care home.
An initial assessment by Pembrokeshire County Council, highlighted concerns about the visual impact, with the authority’s landscape officer commenting that the store would introduce “an intense urban function into an otherwise rural context”.
The report added: “It is not considered to be compatible with the character of the site and the area within which it is located; and furthermore, will lead to a harmful visual impact on the setting of the National Park.”
The application will be considered by county planners at a later date.
Business
Senedd approves £116m transitional relief for business rates
BUSINESSES facing sharp hikes in tax bills after the 2026 revaluation will see increases phased in over two years after the Senedd backed a new transitional relief scheme.
Senedd Members unanimously approved regulations to help businesses which face significant rises in non-domestic rates bills after a revaluation taking effect in April 2026.
The Welsh Government estimates the transitional relief will support 25,000 ratepayers at a cost of £77m in 2026/27 and £39m in 2027/28. The partial relief covers 67% of the increase in the first year and 34% in the second.
Mark Drakeford, Wales’ finance secretary, stressed the £116m scheme comes on top of permanent rate reliefs which are currently worth £250m a year. He said ratepayers for two-thirds of properties will pay no bill at all or receive some level of relief.
The former First Minister told the Senedd: “In providing this transitional relief scheme, we are closely replicating the scheme of relief we provided following the 2023 revaluation – supporting all areas of the tax base in a consistent and straightforward manner.”
The Conservatives’ Sam Rowlands expressed his party’s support for the transitional relief scheme which will help ratepayers facing sharp increases after the 2026 revaluation.

He said: “We are grateful that the Welsh Government has at least brought forward a scheme that will soften the immediate impact for thousands of Welsh businesses.
“We also understand that if these regulations are not approved or supported… this relief scheme will not be in existence. Many businesses across Wales would face steep increases with no protection at all and that is certainly not an outcome we would want.”
But the shadow finance secretary warned businesses up and down Wales are worried about the increase in rates that they are liable to pay.
Advocating scrapping rates for all small businesses in Wales, Mr Rowlands said: “We’ve heard first-hand from many of those in the hospitality and leisure sector, some of whom are facing increases of over 100% in the tax rates they are expected to pay.”
Responding as the Senedd signed off on the scheme on December 16, Prof Drakeford said the Welsh Government had to wait for the UK budget to know if funding was available. As a result of the time constraints, the regulations were not subject to formal consultation.
Prof Drakeford agreed with Mr Rowlands that voting against the regulations would not improve support, only eliminate the transitional relief package before the Senedd.

Earlier in Tuesday’s Senedd proceedings, former Tory group leader Paul Davies warned Welsh businesses have already been hit with some of the highest business rates in the UK.
He said: “The latest business rates revaluation has meant that some businesses are now facing rises of several hundred per cent compared with previous assessments…
“Whilst I appreciate that a transitional relief scheme will help some businesses manage these changes, the reality is that for many businesses it’s not enough and some businesses will be forced into a position where they will have to close.”
-
Crime2 days agoMilford Haven man jailed after drunken attack on partner and police officers
-
News5 days agoDyfed-Powys Police launch major investigation after triple fatal crash
-
Crime2 days agoTeenager charged following rape allegation at Saundersfoot nightclub
-
Crime3 days agoMan charged with months of coercive control and assaults
-
Crime4 days agoMan sent to Crown Court over historic indecent assault allegations
-
Crime6 days agoMan spared jail after baseball bat incident in Milford Haven
-
Crime4 days agoMilford Haven man admits multiple offences after A477 incident
-
Crime3 days agoWoman ‘terrified in own home’ after ex breaches court order










Gareth Evans
April 25, 2014 at 6:07 pm
Disgraceful, both should hang your heads in shame and leave Pembrokeshire for good.
malclom cummings
April 26, 2014 at 10:07 am
Crooks the pair of them. Shamefull what they have done .Makes you think have they been at it elsewhere in their work as IFAS.
ronnie briggs
May 27, 2014 at 7:28 pm
if they had a brain between them may be they would have known they could not get away with what they were up too. door to door salesmen or tesco shelf stacker who would trust someone like that again hopefully they will look into there all so called business dealings