News
Badger goes to the farm
HELLO READERS! WELL, just when you thought that the aff airs of Pembrokeshire County Council could not slip any deeper into the realms of Whitehall farce (keep your trousers on, Huw!), we had the fi nal act in the saga of ‘A Funny Th ing Happened on the Way to the Dole Queue’, which Badger can only describe as not only being beyond parody but almost beyond belief. Back when Badger wrote his last column, our hero – Bryn Parry-Jones – was on his way out of County Hall, borne aloft on the narrow shoulders of the IPPG along a path strewn with palm fronds and rose petals, while Unison members sobbed with laughter. And then there was a surprise last minute twist of the type beloved by fi lm directors like Alfred Hitchcock, David Fincher and Peter Rogers (the last being an auteur of the genre, being behind classic crime thrillers like Carry on Constable).
Rather like Banquo’s ghost rocking up at the feast, the Auditor made an appearance and threw over the council’s ‘best off er’ possible deal. Now, readers, to understand this you have to ask yourself a very straightforward question based upon events at County Hall over the last calendar year. Let us swift ly recap the situation, readers: • In September 2013, this newspaper exposed the fact that Bryn Parry- Jones had entered into a scheme designed to help him avoid tax on his seven-fi gure pension pot.
Instead, Mr Parry-Jones would receive the grossed up equivalents of the council’s contribution to his pot for him to invest as he wished for his retirement. • In January, the Assistant Auditor for Wales ruled that the payments handed to Bryn Parry-Jones in lieu of pension contributions were unlawful.
• In February, the council held an extraordinary meeting at which the council agreed to stop making the payments. • In May the Chief Executive was invited to repay the pay supplements.
• In July, the Chief Executive said, through his representatives, that not only would he not pay back the money he had received but that he was considering his position about suing the council to make it continue the unlawful payments.
• In August, the Chief Executive took a ‘period of absence’ aft er this paper revealed how he subjected two councillors to a tirade of abuse for not voting in accordance with his wishes and interests in relation to his repayment of the unlawful payments. • On October 16, the council agreed a £330K settlement package. Crucially, that settlement package included compensating the Chief Executive in respect of the unlawful payments he had not received since February and the unlawful payments were taken into account when calculating other elements of the compensation package. Several councillors parroted the view that, while it was a lot of money, the £330K was a triumph for tough negotiating and was the best the council could do.
• Last Tuesday, the Assistant Auditor for Wales stepped in and pointed out the logical fl aw in Baldrick Adams’ cunning plan. Can you guess what the Wales Audit Offi ce thought of compensating an offi cer for unlawful payments made to him? I bet you can, readers! But, apparently, the assembled brainpower of the council, its own legal team and their external advisors had not considered the Auditor might look askance at the prospect. For a few desperate hours, the carefully laid plans of mice and men (well, readers, certainly those of rodents) lay in tatters all about them. Contrary to the spin the council tried to put on events, this was not a case of dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s to the Auditor’s satisfaction. Th e Auditor made it clear that there was no agreement between him and the council to sign off on a deal which contained elements he had earlier this year ruled unlawful.
Drawing a comparison with modes of travel: it appeared as though that the council was in a small canoe on a well known brown and smelly waterway without a means of propulsion. Several issues arose: if the agreement was not signed, would Bryn return? Put another way: How could Bryn return when the leader of council, in an earlier interview, had related how much better things were now he had gone? More to the point, would the council need to call councillors together to vote on any revised deal? (Almost certainly) And what were then the risks of no deal being approved? Would the council allow the Investigatory Committee to meet and to potentially suspend Bryn to avoid him appearing at County Hall on Monday (Nov 3), like a cross between last night’s dodgy curry and Fu Manchu? But a deal was announced on Friday (Oct 31).
The council had appeased the Auditor by shaving the unlawful elements out of the deal. Bryn had taken a hit of £52K and would now receive a paltry £280K for piloting the council to public ignominy and to levels of ridicule that s u c c e e d e d in giving the impression that the council were to government what Laurel and Hardy were to piano moving. Now, readers, Badger has it from an impeccable source that his Royal Bryness’ opening gambit in negotiations was for a settlement around £550K in value. In the end, he has copped just over half that fi gure. And here, readers, here is the big question that arises from all of this?
If – on short notice – the former CEO of our council was prepared to shed over £50K from his pay off , what confi dence can we have that this was best settlement possible? Because the fact Bryn accepted over £50K less than the council agreed on October 16 suggests that, unless the council put another sweetener on the table to sugar taking £50K off the settlement, the £330K plus deal agreed originally was signifi cantly more than he would have settled for. The question for the thinking councillor is not whether or not they should have had the chance to scrutinise the lower deal, but rather whether they can have any faith whatsoever in the bland and blithe assurances of the council’s leadership that everything necessarily is as they are being told.
It is remarkable, readers, that a supposed group of independent councillors can come together – without whipping or direction – and as one not only back “the best deal possible” but churn out the same line of re-assuring drivel, self-justifi catory nonsense, and abuse of those who questioned whether £330K was the best deal possible. Pull the other one. It’s got bells on. No doubt another magnum opus from the council’s own Beria, former PC Rob Summons, is headed for the pages of another local newspaper explaining how – rather like the desperate propaganda put about by Squealer in Animal Farm – black is really white and that Boxer really was only taken to the hospital and not to the knacker’s yard. If Orwell shone the same light as on the Kremlin on the Cleddau, which animal would represent your councillor, readers?
Entertainment
Paws-ibly dog-free show comes to Torch Theatre
ACCLAIMED theatre-maker Sam Freeman is bringing We’re Not Getting A Dog to the Torch Theatre in Milford Haven this February — a new, comic, roughly 72-minute solo show packed with domestic observation and a quietly rueful bite.
Told through passive-aggressive letters, early-morning jet-washing and the small rituals we cling to in an effort to make a house feel like a home, the production casts a wry eye on what it means to live close to other people — neighbours we see every day, yet barely know.
“It’s really hard to describe the show,” Freeman said. “I guess it’s best to imagine a really gorgeous Radio 4 late-night comedy, but performed live — it’s heart-warming and like being wrapped in a warm hug. It’s a show to warm the soul.”

The performance weaves multiple storylines together: a couple sprinting through rain to catch a bus, a man staring at a blank laptop screen in despair, and a woman opening an envelope to reveal a photograph. Each moment builds towards a bigger picture, drawing the audience into a narrative where not everything is as straightforward as it first appears.
“It’s a real joy to perform because you let this story unfold,” Freeman added. “You see these moments where people laugh, occasionally cry, but also join the dots and discover that not everything is as simple as it first may seem.”
Read from a little black book, the show has been described as a hidden gem — a quietly powerful and comic examination of home, connection and distance.
And for anyone wondering about the dog on the poster, Freeman has an answer.
“Everyone wants to know about the dog on the poster… It’s my border terrier Poppy — absolute psychopath,” he said. “Whether she makes it into the show… well… you’ll have to see it to find out.”
We’re Not Getting A Dog will be performed at the Torch Theatre on Saturday, 14 February at 7.30pm. Tickets are £8. For more information, visit the Torch Theatre website or contact the Box Office on (01646) 695267.
Health
Hywel Dda board to consider refreshed health strategy to 2040
New plan promises more care closer to home, ‘Digital First’ services, and stronger focus on prevention
HYWEL DDA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD will consider a refreshed version of its long-term health and care strategy at a public board meeting on Thursday (Jan 29).
The proposed strategy, titled A Healthier Mid and West Wales – Healthier lives, well lived, sets out the Health Board’s priorities up to 2040 and updates ambitions first published in 2018.
Health chiefs say the refreshed plan does not change Hywel Dda’s core aim of helping people live healthier lives for longer, with a stronger emphasis on preventing ill-health and supporting people to stay well. Instead, it updates the strategy to reflect changing needs across the region, alongside wider pressures on health and care services including rising demand and the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The strategy sets out how clinical developments, new digital tools and community facilities could provide more opportunities to offer help earlier and closer to home, while outlining how services may need to adapt in the years ahead.
Hywel Dda said the draft refresh has been shaped by engagement with communities, staff and partners across Carmarthenshire, Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire. The engagement took place in two phases between July and November 2025 and involved almost 3,000 people.
Residents were asked what matters most to them in living a healthier life, as well as being invited to share views on priorities for health and care. The Health Board said feedback was used to develop four key themes which underpin the refreshed strategy: thriving teams, healthier communities, great care and positive futures.
During the engagement, people consistently raised concerns about the distance they have to travel to access healthcare. The Health Board said the refreshed strategy aims to deliver more care closer to where people live, with greater support in communities and at home.
The plan also outlines an expanded role for digital services, including easier access to advice, appointment booking and test results. The Health Board said it intends to create a ‘Digital First’ service designed to connect homes, communities and hospitals.
The refreshed strategy also builds on work started in 2018 on a Social Model for Health and Wellbeing, which aims to shift services away from mainly reacting to illness and towards preventing ill-health earlier, with prevention described as a central priority for improving health and reducing long-term demand.
Hywel Dda Chief Executive Professor Phil Kloer said: “Our communities have been clear about what matters most to them. People want fair access to care, strong local services, and support to stay well in their daily lives.
“This proposed strategy refresh is about listening to that feedback and setting a clear direction for how we work together over the next 15 years. Our strategy focuses on health and keeping people well, not just treating illness.
“It is also guided by our values of belonging, growth and working together. These values continue to emphasise the importance of putting people first, improving our services, and supporting each other to deliver the best care possible.
“We will continue to work with our communities and the individuals who play a vital role in shaping our social model for health and wellbeing.”
Lee Davies, Hywel Dda’s Executive Director of Strategy and Planning, said delivering the refreshed plan would require “a more radical approach” to how care is provided.
He said: “The principles of our 2018 strategy remain the same, but the world around us has changed. This refresh ensures our vision, goals and priorities reflect today’s challenges and opportunities.
“We will continue to move towards prevention, wellbeing and primary and community care, supported by digital solutions where appropriate. Most importantly, it shows how what people told us is being reflected in our plans.”
The Health Board said that if the refreshed strategy is approved, it will be finalised and published in multiple accessible formats. Work with communities, staff and partners would continue as delivery plans are developed, and the strategy would be regularly reviewed to reflect changes and developments in health needs across the region.
Health
Withybush staff fear crèche fee rise will price parents out
50% jump from March as Health Board says charges must increase to maintain “high-quality care”
WITHYBUSH HOSPITAL staff with young children have raised concerns over a steep rise in crèche fees which they say could leave some parents questioning whether it is worth staying in work.
Hywel Dda University Health Board has confirmed the hourly rate at the Withybush Crèche will increase from £4.50 per hour to £6.50 per hour from March 2026.
Parents told The Herald the increase will hit families with children under three particularly hard, as they do not qualify for the same level of childcare support available to older children.
One parent of a two-year-old said the change could add around £450 a month for parents using the service five days a week, warning that once childcare is taken into account, their partner — who works in an administrative role at the hospital — would effectively be “working for £20 a day”.
In a statement, Andrew Carruthers, Chief Operating Officer at Hywel Dda University Health Board said: “From March 2026, we will need to increase the hourly rate for our childcare fees at Withybush Crèche from £4.50 per hour to £6.50 per hour, which is broadly in line with other local service providers. Our fees have remained the same for several years, but to continue to provide the high-quality care children attending our crèche deserve, we now need to make this adjustment.
“This decision has not been taken lightly and follows a rigorous review into how we could offer best value for money for parents using the service.
“We have sent letters to parents explaining the changes and are inviting parents who have any questions or would like to talk this through to get in touch with us.”
-
News7 days agoWhitland Post Office to reopen under new management in March
-
News3 days agoMilford Haven man expelled from Russia amid spy allegations
-
News5 days agoCampaigners threaten judicial review over state pension redress talks
-
Health17 hours agoHywel Dda board to consider refreshed health strategy to 2040
-
Local Government7 days agoCouncillor suspended for four years after tribunal finds code breaches
-
Crime7 days agoChristopher Phillips jailed for life for “grotesque” sexual violence against baby
-
Community7 days agoA generous character remembered after death of scaffolding boss Jozef Polak
-
Local Government3 days agoFinal budget published with £1.2bn uplift for Wales








