Education

Calls for balanced use of technology

Published

11 years ago

June 24, 2015

Tom Sinclair

Is this the future?: Technology concerns

A LEADING child psychologist has warned of the dangers of an over use of technology by the UK’s children. Linda Blair, speaking at the Cheltenham Science Festival, has suggested parents refrain from allowing children to use electronic devices before they set off for school as she believes it could harm their concentration levels in school. she has also called on schools to limit the amount of homework that required computer use.
She said: “It makes me mad because a lot of schools are doing screen homework. It’s so stupid – I wish they wouldn’t do that.”
However, a Pembrokeshire County Council spokesperson has hit back, stating: “It is part of our role as educators to provide pupils with the experience of using a wide range of technologies to support learning in order to equip them with the skills required in the modern working environment. Ideally, there should be a balanced approach to the use of technology in the home just as there is in school.”
Ms Blair did however accept that limiting screen use ‘was not a popular move’, but believes it can ‘transform things’ for young people. She went on to suggest a partial move away from the use of technology, saying: “I encourage people to try it for a couple of days,” and continued by suggesting families ‘establish one point in the day where the family focuses on each other. Saying: “That used to be called dinner. All screens are off and you actually talk to each other. They will moan but 10 years from now they will remember it and thank you. You have to set limits. Kids have got to know how to manage their screens and be in control.”
The author of the book, ‘The Key to Calm’, also encouraged parents to set an example by limiting their ‘screen time’ and in her book states that ‘computers and other screens emit a blue light that has been shown to reduce levels of melatonin – a chemical produced by the body that aids restful sleep’.
Two leading teaching unions also wanted to have their say on the issue.
Owen Hathway, NUT Wales Policy Officer, said: “It will be interesting to review the research into this issue. It is of course important that children do come to school enthused and ready to work. We know that pupils who are up late watching TV or playing with computers or games stations can lack energy and concentration in class. It could well be that there is a similar impact for early morning use. At the same time we are in a digital age and smartphones and tablets are part, not just of modern life, but of the learning experience. I think what is important is that any use of these technologies around school are geared towards supplementing education. Using these devices for educational purposes can be highly effective and should be encouraged in that regard, but naturally only where it benefits rather than hinders the child’s ability to play an active role in the classroom.”
Dr Philip DIxon, Director of ATL Cymru, also went on to say: “The advent of computers and the internet has obviously provided us with great tools unknown to previous generations. Our children are growing up in a technological age and will need to be digitally literate to survive and prosper in the twenty first century. However, as with all advances we need to tread carefully. Some research suggests that too much computer work can be bad for us all let alone young children. So we need a healthy mix of learning and enjoyment from a variety of sources.”
Plaid Cymru Shadow Education and Skills Minister Mid and West AM Simon Thomas said: “Plaid Cymru’s election campaign in 2007 had a policy of free laptop computers for pupils. In the One Wales government we delivered on that pledge to those pupils most in need. This policy provided a level playing field for those who did not have access to a computer at home. Smart devices are part of the world of work and our everyday lives. As a parent and an elected representative I think we should embrace technology and not try and ban children from using them. There of course has to be a balanced approach between the use of technology and traditional methods of learning. There is evidence that smart screens can stimulate in an inappropriate way but this is best handled by the class teacher. Pupils often outstrip teachers in their skilful use of modern computing but we also need to teach coding to create, as well as use, programmes. We need young people equipped with the skills that can make the Welsh workforce a global competitor and just as importantly the skills to access knowledge throughout their lives.”
In the US research has also highlighted problems with pupils and mobile phone use, an increasing issue here in Wales. Academics at the Ohio University, Illinois State University and Nebraska University found out that students sending and receiving messages while studying actually scored lower test grades. 145 undergraduates took part in the research.
In the report it stated: “It is a common occurrence to observe students who are physically present, yet mentally preoccupied by non-course-related material on their mobile devices. As mobile devices have deeply saturated the college student population, this problem will likely continue to pose a significant obstacle.”
Some lecturers and universities are in favour of incorporating this technology into lessons, others want to see an outright ban on their use. The research went on to state: “Perhaps one of the biggest challenges instructors face in the 21st Century college classroom is the struggle of retaining student interest and engagement while students remain connected to the outside world through their mobile devices.”
A study published last month by the London School of Economics utilised schools in four English cities and concluded that test scores increased by more than 6% in those schools which banned the use of mobile phones. Researchers also concluded that it was the low-achieving pupils who were most likely to be distracted by these devices.

Education

Tenby students compete in UK robotics challenge

Published

21 hours ago

March 14, 2026

Tom Sinclair

STUDENTS from Ysgol Greenhill in Tenby have taken part in the FIRST Tech Challenge UK & Ireland competition, showcasing their engineering and computing skills at a national robotics event.

The Tenby Techno Team travelled to the University of Wales Trinity Saint David’s School of Applied Computingwhere teams from across the UK and Ireland gathered to compete in the international robotics programme.

The competition challenges students to design, build and programme robots capable of completing tasks on a specialist arena, testing both technical ability and teamwork.

The Tenby team said they were proud to be competing and were supported during the event by former computing students Issac, Ieuan and Finley, who returned to help the team as volunteers.

Organisers of the programme say the FIRST Tech Challenge aims to inspire young people to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics while building practical problem-solving skills.

The team also thanked Valero Pembroke Refinery and Tenby Round Table for sponsoring the project, along with Marc Ingram, who provided advice and guidance during the build and preparation stages.

More updates from the competition are expected as the event progresses.

Education

Port joins careers event for Pembrokeshire pupils

Published

22 hours ago

March 14, 2026

Tom Sinclair

THE PORT OF MILFORD HAVEN joined students from schools across Pembrokeshire for a careers event aimed at inspiring the next generation of workers in the region.

The event, organised by the SPARC Alliance, took place at the Canolfan Arloesedd y Bont / Bridge Innovation Centre. Pupils were given the opportunity to learn about a range of career opportunities available at the port and the wider maritime sector.

Representing the Port of Milford Haven were Pilot Jamie Furlong, Project Manager Claire Lawrence, Environmental & Sustainability Assistant Bethan Davie, HR Director Vidette Swales and Stakeholder Engagement Executive Emily Jones.

Students spoke directly with the team about different roles within the organisation and the skills needed to work in areas such as shipping operations, project management, environmental work and stakeholder engagement.

The Port thanked the SPARC Alliance for hosting the event and said supporting initiatives that connect young people with employers and highlight opportunities in Pembrokeshire is something it is proud to be part of.

Education

Influencers amplify misinformation and online toxicity, study finds

Published

3 days ago

March 12, 2026

Tom Sinclair

SOCIAL media influencers can significantly increase the spread and toxicity of misinformation online, according to new research led by academics at Cardiff Business School.

The study, published in the journal Psychology & Marketing, analysed brand-related misinformation and associated user comments across forty-seven brands in nine industries over a three-year period. Researchers say it is the first study to measure how online toxicity differs when misinformation comes from influencers rather than ordinary users.

Brands increasingly rely on social media influencers to reach audiences, with spending on influencer marketing hitting a record $33bn in 2025. While influencers can drive engagement and sales, the communities built around them can also amplify inaccurate claims and direct hostility towards brands.

The research found that regular social media users who spread misinformation are often challenged or criticised by other users. As a result, discussions tend to become more civil over time as inaccuracies are corrected.

Influencers, however, face the opposite incentive. Their visibility, engagement and profits often increase when posts generate controversy or strong emotional reactions.

The analysis found that online toxicity was particularly high when influencers discussed socio-political issues, where public emotions and stakes are greater.

Lead author Dr Giandomenico Di Domenico said: “Social media influencers often have huge followings that are extremely valuable for brands seeking to increase sales.

“But our research shows the negative consequences when influencers endorse or amplify misinformation. Under the same conditions that increase their visibility and influence, influencers also generate significantly more toxic engagement than regular users.”

He explained that the close relationships influencers cultivate with their followers play a key role.

“Unlike regular users, influencers form parasocial bonds with their communities. These relationships make followers far more likely to support or defend claims without critically questioning them.

“This means misinformation introduced within these networks does not simply attract attention — it can transform scattered reactions into collective, belief-driven antagonism.”

The researchers identified two key mechanisms that strengthen misinformation when it comes from influencers.

The first is “legitimation”, where the influencer’s endorsement lends credibility to a claim. The second is “community enmeshment”, where followers rally around the influencer and reinforce the narrative.

When combined, these factors can create what researchers describe as “toxic echo chambers”, producing a self-reinforcing cycle in which toxicity increases engagement — and engagement encourages further inflammatory content.

The study highlights how these dynamics played out in early 2025 when several TikTok influencers posted viral videos claiming luxury brands including Hermès, Louis Vuitton and Chanel secretly manufactured products in Chinese factories while marketing them as “Made in France” or “Made in Italy”.

The videos presented the claims as exposés of industry deception but offered no verifiable evidence. Despite this, they generated millions of views and fuelled widespread online debate about authenticity, ethics and transparency in the luxury industry.

Dr Di Domenico said the example illustrates a growing tension within influencer culture.

“Despite the positive impact influencers can have on marketing outcomes, their prominence also introduces new risks,” he said.

“When misleading or controversial claims are amplified by influencers, the resulting backlash can create highly toxic environments that damage brands and distort public understanding.”

The research paper, titled Don’t You Know That You’re Toxic? How Influencer-Driven Misinformation Fuels Online Toxicity, is published in Psychology & Marketing.