News
Verdict of accidental death recorded following tragic telehandler accident
JONATHAN HUW HOWELLS was a man who took great pride in his work.
His machinery was immaculately maintained, and he always carried out his mechanical and agricultural duties to a high standard.
But on the afternoon of November 8, 2020, Mr Howells touched a control on his Merlo Telehandler causing the boom to rise towards an 11,000-volt electric cable. Even though the boom didn’t touch the cable, its tremendous voltage caused an arcing effect which electrocuted Mr Howells to death. The intensity of the charge blackened the step leading up to the Merlo, which was where Mr Howells had been standing, together with another piece of ground alongside the vehicle; both the front and back wheels of the Marlo had caught fire.
This week a jury inquest at County Hall, Haverfordwest, recorded a verdict of accidental death after considering the tragic circumstances.
“Everyone was proud of the work that Huw did and the care that he took,” his wife, Catherine Howells, told this week’s inquest at Pembrokeshire Coroners Court. “Two days earlier he’d been trimming some trees and had worked closely with Western Power Distribution concerning the electric cables overhead. This was not something he took lightly. I can’t understand why this has happened.”
A family friend, Emrys Davies, had asked Mr Howells to trim some trees on his farm at Dan y Coed, Llawhaden, as he wanted to install a care-line telephone. Mr Howells left his home at Gellyrenwyn, Gilfach Hill, Lampeter Velfrey, at around 9.30am and spent the day cutting back branches assisted by another close friend, Brian Twoose, a mechanic, Brian’s wife, Linda, and her sister.
At around 4.20 pm they finished their work, however Mr Davies mentioned that some more trees on his farmyard needed trimming. Mr Howells positioned his Merlo near to the trees and extended the boom to within two feet of the 11,000-volt cable.
But in his statement to the inquest, Health and Safety electricity expert Mr Stephen Reeves said this was dangerously close. “It’s likely that anyone who comes into close proximity to a cable with that magnitude of voltage would be electrocuted.”
He went on to say that Western Power Distribution guidelines advise people to carry out work within a three-metre exclusion zone from 11,000-volt cables such as the one at Dan y Coed. To draw a comparison, Mr Reeves said the voltage in commercial and domestic buildings is a mere 230 volts.
“Western Power guidance doesn’t seem to have been followed in this very tragic case,” he concluded.
Meanwhile, in his written statement to the inquest, Mr Twose said that Mr Howells was happy with the height of the boom. “We were watching, to make sure it wasn’t touching and when it was about two feet from the cables, we all agreed not to go any higher.”
After stepping down to check whether it would be possible to cut the branches, Mr Twose saw Mr Howells return to the Telehandler “He looked into the cab from outside and reached in. I don’t know what he did, but the boom moved upwards towards
the power line. I screamed at him to stop but by now he was standing completely still, holding onto the machine bolt upright.”
Eventually Mr Howells was seen to loosen his grip and collapse to the ground. A postmortem confirmed that he had died from cardiac arrest and electrocution.
After considering the evidence, Acting Senior Coroner Mr Paul Bennett said that given Mr Howells’ long-standing experience in operating equipment such as the Merlo and in cutting down branches, he would have been aware of Western Powers’ guidelines. “It’s highly likely that he had used the guidance in the past but on this particular occasion, it might well have been a lapse of concentration where he forgot about where he was in relation to the boom. Something occurred which caused the electric to come within that exclusion area.”
Why The Herald covers inquests
We understand that the death of a loved-one is an incredibly painful time for their friends and relatives. As journalists, we have all suffered loss and the grief that goes with it so we can understand how traumatic it can be if that death is unexpected. Covering inquests is not a job any journalist relishes. But it is a vital part of our job and one that can uncover wrongdoing, can expose flaws in systems and can ultimately help families discover the reasons behind the death of their loved-ones.
What are inquests and why are they held?
An inquest is a formal investigation overseen by a coroner to establish how someone died. Inquests are held where a death was sudden and the cause is unknown, where someone has died an unnatural or violent death, or where someone has died in a place or circumstance where there is legal requirement to hold an inquest, for example in prison custody or while sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
The purpose of an inquest is to find out the identity of the deceased as well as where, when and how they died. It does not apportion blame.
Why do journalists go to inquests?
Anyone can attend an inquest. Since the start of the pandemic, some inquests are available on videolink so you may not have to attend in person and you may not notice that a journalist is attending via videolink. But all inquests are held in public and therefore all the information you hear at an inquest is already in the public domain.
We understand that there may be details heard at inquests that are very private, but nevertheless contributed to the reasons behind the death. We will do our very best to ensure that these details are reported sensitively and accurately.
Deaths affect communities as well as families and their repercussions can often be wide.
Why is coverage important?
It is in the public interest that people are able to hear the circumstances behind any untimely death because there may have been unfair or inaccurate rumours in the community that can be cleared up by accurate and concise coverage of the inquest.
There are many lessons that can be learned from inquests. Drawing the attention of the public to the circumstances surrounding someone’s death could be key to preventing similar deaths in the future. Explaining how drug or alcohol abuse led to someone’s death may encourage others to seek help for addiction. Showing how the high speed of a driver caused a fatal crash may act as a warning for those who drive too quickly. Reporting on the details what happened before a person took their own life may raise warning flags for the loved-ones of others who may be considering the same.
There is a real chance that coverage of inquests can prevent similar deaths in the future.
Coverage of inquests can often provide a platform for families to campaign about issues they’ve encountered or can provide relief that wrongdoing has been publicly exposed.
Because inquests are held in open court, they are subject to the principles of open justice and transparency which are a cornerstone of our justice system. Because the judgements of a coroner are not usually widely available elsewhere, newspaper reports may be the only comprehensive, publicly accessible record of the proceedings.
Why didn’t you tell me there was going to be a story online?
Before any inquest a coroner’s officer should always tell families that the media will be present at an inquest. You should always assume that an inquest is going to be covered by the press or wider media and that coverage will be online a short time after the verdict.
We know that the facts outlined at inquests can often be stark or upsetting and that the details sometimes do not represent the essence of a person or the many great things they did in their lives.
We are always keen to speak to relatives so that they can add tributes, or can tell us why their loved-one was so special to them. We are always happy to include extra detail in our reports to ensure that we do justice to their memory.
You can always email or call us us with anything you want us to add, or even contact us ahead of an inquest.
If you do not want to speak to us, then we will respect that. We will not approach you again if you tell us, you do not want to speak to us.
Unfortunately, we will not remove reports of inquests from our website but we are always happy to correct genuine typographical errors.
We do our best to delete any inappropriate comments on our own Facebook page but if you spot any that we have missed under the report of an inquest then please get in touch with us.
What are the journalistic guidelines around covering inquests?
As professional journalists we do not include all the evidence heard at an inquests and we do make editorial judgements in order to summarise the evidence heard.
But we won’t ever publish sensationalist coverage and we will always do our best to be as sensitive as we can, while reporting the facts to maintain the principle of open justice.
There are specific guidelines around the reporting of suicides which mean that journalists cannot provide excessive detail around the method of suicide. You can find details here.
The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) provides best-practice guidance to journalists around the coverage of inquests. This leaflet explains more about these guidelines.
Crime
Land occupiers fined for breaching Council enforcement notice
TWO individuals, Paula Janetta Foster, 68, and Tobias Foster, 43, both of Wilden, Narberth, Pembrokeshire, were fined at Ceredigion and Pembrokeshire Youth Court on Thursday for failing to comply with an enforcement notice served by Pembrokeshire County Council.
The defendants, who were present in court and represented by solicitor James Ryan of Acuity Law, initially pleaded not guilty to the charges but later changed their pleas to guilty on 3rd October 2024. The case was heard at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court.
The charges related to their failure, as occupiers of the land, to adhere to the conditions set out in an enforcement notice issued by the council on 27th May 2021. The notice, INV/0196/19, required specific steps to be taken, which the Fosters failed to do between 12th August 2022 and 23rd July 2024. This was in violation of Section 179(5) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
Paula Janetta Foster was fined £200, ordered to pay a surcharge of £80 to fund victim services, and £330 in costs, bringing the total sum to £610. Tobias Foster received a fine of £450, a surcharge of £180, and was ordered to pay costs of £330.70, totalling £960.70.
The court made collection orders for both defendants, taking their guilty pleas into account when imposing the sentences, resulting in a 25% reduction. Both Fosters were granted time to pay, with monthly instalments of £30 commencing on 31st October 2024.
News
Nurse sacked after paying £23k for job at Pembrokeshire care home
BORN into a farming family in the village of Lakhmirwala, where her family tends a modest 3-acre farm cultivating cotton, wheat, and rice, Princejot Kaur’s journey to the UK came at an enormous personal cost. Her story sheds light on the plight faced by many overseas workers who seek better opportunities abroad, only to be met with uncertainty, exploitation, and shattered dreams.
“I wanted to help in the UK, learn new skills, and then go back to India to help people there,” Princejot explained. “There isn’t the same opportunity for advanced medical training in India. This was a way to gain valuable experience.”
After qualifying as a registered nurse, Princejot worked for four years at the Jaipur Health Care & Test Tube Baby Centre in Bhatinda. Despite her skills and experience being in high demand, she sought further development in the UK, where healthcare workers were being recruited to fill critical shortages. Encouraged by the promise of a better future, Princejot and her family pooled their life savings to finance her move abroad.
Her introduction to the UK care sector was orchestrated through an agent named Ram Maahi, who claimed extensive experience in arranging visas and work placements. Operating through his company, Sparkline Immigration Services, he promised to secure her a role in a UK care home. However, what initially seemed like a path to opportunity quickly turned into a costly and uncertain venture for Princejot and her family.
“We paid the agent 2.6 million rupees, which is just over £23,000 at current exchange rates,” she said. “My family and I paid in instalments by cheque. Later, I found out that the visa only cost £570. I felt cheated, but at the time, I believed he was helping me.”
This was just the beginning of the mounting expenses. Princejot also had to pay an additional £500 for her flight with Virgin Airlines to make the journey from India to the UK. Despite the growing financial burden, her family remained hopeful, trusting that their investment in her future would ultimately pay off.
“When the visa was arranged, the agent invited my whole family to his office. We were so happy. It felt like all our hard work and savings had paid off,” she recalls. But this joy was to be short-lived.
A difficult start at Rickeston Mill Care Home
Princejot arrived in Pembrokeshire in May 2024, ready to start her new job at Rickeston Mill Care Home. The care home had recently come under new ownership. Shruti Gurappadi , a registered nurse, and her husband Surya were now in charge having just taken the reins. However, from the outset, Princejot felt ill-prepared for the role.
“The training wasn’t enough,” she lamented. “I was thrown in at the deep end. This wasn’t the kind of work I was used to. I’m trained in working with children and medical patients, but this was very different.”
Despite her nursing background, she struggled to adapt to elderly care. Although some minor incidents occurred during her adjustment period, she believed they were not significant enough to justify the treatment she received.
“I was trying my best. The residents were very kind to me, and I was one of their favourite carers. But I wasn’t given the proper support or training to succeed,” she said.
A colleague, who wished to remain anonymous, confirmed the lack of sufficient training provided to staff at the care home. “We were all thrown in with little guidance. The same thing happened to Princejot. She was a good worker, and many of the residents were upset when she was suddenly no longer there.”
When approached for employment records, Rickeston Mill declined, citing privacy concerns and GDPR regulations. However, Princejot provided a copy of her staff feedback, which highlighted her positive contributions. Despite the common challenges new employees face, some of the feedback underscored her kindness, compassion, and dedication to the residents.
Feedback forms, filled in by several staff members before a review meeting into her performance did throw up some areas of concern, and areas of improvement were needed. However in those same forms, Princejot was recognised for her eagerness to learn and her efforts to communicate effectively with the residents and their families. Given that she was navigating her first few months in a new country, her ability to adapt was commendable.
‘Unable to discuss details’
When contacted for expliain their version of events, Surya Gurappadi of Rickeston Mill Care Home responded via email: “Due to our legal obligations under GDPR and privacy laws, we are unable to discuss specific details regarding individual employment matters.”
He continued: “Rickeston Mill Nursing Home adheres to the highest standards of care and follows established protocols for staff training, performance evaluation, and dismissal processes. All employees receive comprehensive training and support, including an induction period and regular updates, to ensure they are well-equipped for their roles.”
Regarding the appeals process available to her after being sacked, Gurappadi stated, “We have a formal process in place that allows dismissed employees to challenge decisions, ensuring fairness and impartiality.”
The care home insisted they recruit directly, without external facilitation, stating: “We remain committed to treating all staff, including those on sponsorship visas, in compliance with UK employment laws and consult regularly with our HR advisors to maintain best practices.”
‘The agent’s role’
Despite these assurances, evidence suggests that the agent in India was in direct contact with the care home via Indeed. Princejot claims that her job was sourced through her agent, who corresponded with the care home on her behalf. “He even set up the login details for Indeed and an email address for me, without my knowledge. He told me the money I paid was for his fee, the facilitation of sponsorship for the visa, and the visa fee.”
These practices raise questions about the care home’s awareness of common visa sponsorship scams and whether they believed they were communicating directly with the applicant or the agent. The care home denies that they had any dealings with the external agent.
A broader issue of exploitation
Princejot’s experience is not an isolated incident. In 2024, police in Mohali arrested owners of an immigration firm accused of defrauding several individuals of around Rs 12.45 lakh (approximately £12,200) by promising jobs abroad, only for the victims to discover their visas were fake. Similarly, in Delhi, a woman reportedly swindled approximately 150 people from India and Nepal, collecting over Rs 4 crore (around £392,000) with false employment promises. Additionally, Indian migrant workers in New Zealand paid between $15,000 and $40,000 NZD (approximately £7,200 to £19,200) to agents for visas and jobs, only to find themselves stranded without employment.
These incidents highlight the importance of thorough verification when seeking overseas employment and the dangers of paying large upfront fees to unregistered recruitment agents.
A struggle for justice
Princejot’s situation is a stark reminder of the exploitation faced by migrant workers. A young woman with a secure job as a nurse in India came to the UK to improve her life and support her family, only to be caught in a web of deceit. While there is no evidence suggesting that her employer was aware of the payment to the agent, there are certainly questions about how they managed her employment.
“If this was a legitimate job offer, and I was meant to remain at the care home, then surely the care home would have informed HMRC of my employment and paid my National Insurance contributions and tax,” she said.
According to the HMRC app, no such payments have been made, and her National Insurance number does not appear on her payslips.
The deductions amount to around £2,000, leaving Princejot penniless in the UK. She is now desperately trying to find employment.
With only two months left to secure a job before being forced to return to India, Princejot’s ordeal is a sobering illustration of the challenges faced by those seeking a better future abroad.
The agent, Ram Maahi, who we initially spoke to on the telephone is now refusing to answer this newspaper’s questions. In that initial call he said that most of the money that he was sent was forwarded to a third party. He could not say who that was. Is he lying?
Who, if anyone, will be held accountable for the exploitation of those travelling overseas to work in Pembrokeshire, like Princejot Kaur?
And what can be done to protect others in the future?
Charity
Little and Broad Haven Lifeboat Station celebrates refurbishment and RNLI bicentennial
The Little and Broad Haven Lifeboat Station recently marked two significant milestones with a grand reopening after extensive refurbishment and a special visit as part of the RNLI’s 200th anniversary celebrations.
On Saturday, 7th September, RNLI volunteers, supporters, and crew members gathered to celebrate the lifeboat station’s official reopening following major refurbishment work carried out over the winter months. The updated facilities, designed to bring the station into the 21st century, were unveiled with a ribbon-cutting ceremony performed by the children of the operational crew and supporters. This heartwarming gesture symbolised the passing of responsibility to the next generation of lifesavers.
Lifeboat Operations Manager, Andy Grey, expressed his pride in the station’s transformation and the success of the event: “The station opening was extremely successful. Not only did the weather hold out, but personnel from the station, including officers and crew, branch members, and shop volunteers, were in attendance, along with guests from our neighbouring RNLI stations. The occasion truly represented the ‘One Crew’ philosophy. To make it even more special, the children of the crew were invited to formally open the new refurbishment of the station. A lovely gesture but also a great memory.”
The upgraded station now provides state-of-the-art facilities, including a modernised lifeboat shop, which will improve working conditions for the dedicated volunteers. Roger Bryan Smith DL, Area Operations Manager, also highlighted the importance of the refurbishment: “I am absolutely delighted that Little and Broad Haven Lifeboat Station has been refurbished to such a high standard. The crew devote an immense amount of their spare time to training to save lives at sea, and it’s marvellous that they now have such great facilities.”
Among the attendees were Gemma Gill, Coxswain of Fishguard Lifeboat, and Will Chant, Coxswain of St Davids Lifeboat Station, who showed their support and helped with presentations. The day was filled with a sense of community and celebration of the station’s lifesaving mission.
Later that month, on Wednesday, 25th September, Little and Broad Haven Lifeboat Station received a special visit as part of the RNLI’s bicentennial year. The RNLI 200 ‘Connecting our Communities’ scroll, which bears the lifeboat pledge, arrived at the station as part of its seven-month journey around 240 RNLI locations across the UK and Ireland. The pledge, printed in Welsh, English, and five other languages, celebrates the dedication of RNLI volunteers and their mission to save lives at sea.
Andy Grey, along with other key members of the station, including Shireen Thomas from the shop, Peter Erte from the fundraising branch, and Water Safety Officer Sue Christopher, had the honour of signing the scroll on behalf of the Little and Broad Haven lifeboat community. The scroll, made from materials significant to the charity, will conclude its journey in October on the Isle of Man, where RNLI founder Sir William Hillary was born. Once the journey is complete, the scroll will bear around 700 signatures and be displayed at the RNLI College in Poole.
Anjie Rook, RNLI Associate Director, overseeing the 200th anniversary programmes, said: “The Connecting our Communities relay is one of the most significant events of the RNLI’s 200th anniversary year as it’s all about our people. For 200 years, it is people who have made the RNLI what it is – from our brave lifesavers who risk their lives to save others, to the committed fundraisers and generous donors who fund our lifesaving work.”
By coincidence, the RNLI Porsche 911 Challenge also arrived at the station on the same day. Belinda and James Richardson, who are travelling 8,500 miles in their Porsche 911 to visit all 238 RNLI lifeboat stations within 911 hours, were delighted to encounter the scroll for the first time on their journey. The couple is raising funds for a new D class inshore lifeboat, which is critical to the RNLI’s lifesaving work. In 2023 alone, D class lifeboats saved 96 lives and assisted over 2,000 people in distress.
Andy Grey reflected on the unique timing of the two events: “Today we had a special visit from the RNLI 911 Challenge and the RNLI Scroll. To happen at the same time and on the same day was unique in itself. The beautiful Porsche of the 911 Challenge presented a jigsaw and a special RNLI-themed version of Top Trumps in memory of their visit to all lifeboat stations in the UK. Four members from the station were asked to sign this wonderful scroll, which will be a memory and recognition of the 200-year celebration of the RNLI.”
Jayne George, RNLI Director of Fundraising, expressed her gratitude for the Richardsons’ efforts: “We are so grateful to Belinda and James for taking on this huge challenge and look forward to welcoming them at all our lifeboat stations around the coast. We are only able to save lives at sea thanks to the generous support of people taking on challenges like this.”
As the RNLI celebrates 200 years of saving lives at sea, Little and Broad Haven Lifeboat Station continues to play a vital role in this enduring mission, with new facilities and a strong community spirit driving them forward into the future.
-
News2 days ago
Nurse sacked after paying £23k for job at Pembrokeshire care home
-
News5 days ago
Three workers hospitalised in incident at Valero Oil Refinery, Pembroke
-
Crime5 days ago
Tenby businessman jailed for sustained and merciless attack on ex-partner
-
Business2 days ago
Safety concerns raised over proposed new Milford Haven Lidl store
-
Crime3 days ago
Police raid cannabis grow at former Woolworths building in Pembroke Dock
-
Community4 days ago
Portfield Fair is back with a bang as mayors check out rides
-
News2 days ago
Woman charged over death of four paddleboarders in Haverfordwest
-
News7 days ago
Adverse weather in Pembrokeshire leads to road closures and school shutdown