Farming
Farmers’ union takes Inheritance Tax fight to the Senedd
AHEAD of a Senedd debate on the UK Government’s controversial changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) on Wednesday 5 March, the Farmers’ Union of Wales (FUW) were in the Senedd, lobbying Welsh politicians to press for the UK Government to review their far-reaching changes.
The debate, tabled by Plaid Cymru, called on the the Welsh Government to make representations to the UK Government to reconsider and pause the family farm tax until they have conducted a thorough consultation and economic review of its impact on working farms.
Despite support from the Welsh Conservatives and Welsh Liberal Democrats, the debate itself saw the Plaid Cymru motion narrowly voted down.
An amended motion supported by the Welsh Government was passed, which recognised the concerns expressed by Welsh farmers about changes to APR, and that Welsh Ministers would continue to advocate to the UK Government that the views of Welsh farmers be given full and proper consideration.
Ahead of the debate the FUW, the independent voice of Wales’ family farms, met with Welsh Conservatives rural affairs spokesperson, Peter Fox MS and Plaid Cymru’s Llyr Gruffydd MS, relaying the farming sectors’ concerns over the potential impact the Treasury’s reforms could have on family farms and domestic food production.
The Prime Minister had previously insisted a “vast majority” of farmers would not be affected by the changes, which are due to take effect from April 2026. Meanwhile UK Treasury’s figures have previously claimed it expects around 500 estates across the UK to be affected by the changes each year.
However, previous research by industry bodies has drawn significant doubts over the Treasury’s figures.
The FUW’s own analysis suggests as many as 48% of Basic Payment Scheme (BPS) recipients in Wales could be affected by the changes, with the union warning the changes could have devastating impact on family farms and food production, as well as leading towards an increase in agricultural land being transferred into the ownership of remote corporate bodies and companies.
The FUW has previously put forward a range of proposals to the proposed changes to better safeguard family farms and the UK’s food security. – a stance it reiterated to the UK Government on several occasions, including a meeting with UK Treasury officials in London in late February.
These proposed changes include the principle that farming/agricultural assets should not be taxed when passed from one generation to another for farming themselves or letting to another farming family. However, if a generation decides to sell those assets, those assets should be taxed at the point of selling.
Commenting following the debate, FUW President, Ian Rickman said: “Changes to APR have triggered significant anxiety within the farming sector in Wales during what is an incredibly difficult time for Welsh farmers, and the FUW has consistently called for the changes to be reviewed.
Considering the continued frustrations within the farming sector that were powerfully articulated during this debate, there was an opportunity here for the Senedd to send a clear, united message to Westminster that this ill-thought-out policy must be paused and reconsidered.
Disappointingly, this opportunity fell short, however as pressure continues to mount from the sector and from the government’s own back benches, the UK Treasury must now do the right thing and revisit these proposals to better safeguard our family farms and the future of Welsh agriculture.”
As well as opposition spokespersons, FUW President Ian Rickman and Deputy President, Dai Miles, also met Welsh Government’s Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs, Huw Irranca-Davies MS. The meeting provided an opportunity to discuss the far-reaching impact changes to APR could have on Welsh family farms, as well as discuss other pressing issues facing the sector, including the Sustainable Farming Scheme, the ongoing review of the Control of Agricultural Pollution regulations, bovine TB and the surveillance of Bluetounge Virus.
Farming
Farmers raise concerns at west Wales hustings as Kurtz criticises Labour policy
Conservative candidate says farmers feel under pressure as parties battle over support, regulation and the future of Welsh agriculture
FARMERS from across the region raised concerns about rising costs, regulation and future support during an agricultural hustings in Aberaeron on Tuesday (Apr 14).
The event, jointly hosted by the Farmers’ Union of Wales, NFU Cymru and Ceredigion Young Farmers’ Clubs, brought together members of the farming community to question candidates on the challenges facing the sector ahead of the Senedd election.
Among those responding was Samuel Kurtz, Conservative candidate for Ceredigion Preseli Pembrokeshire, who said the mood in the room reflected growing frustration among farmers.
Mr Kurtz said: “The hustings made one thing very clear: farmers feel let down, ignored and under increasing pressure from Labour in Cardiff Bay and in Westminster.
“As the Shadow Minister for Rural Affairs, I have been warning for some time that the direction of travel is wrong. Farmers are being asked to do more and more with less and less support.
“Rising costs, burdensome regulation and uncertainty over future funding are placing real strain on farm businesses and family livelihoods.”
He said many in the industry were worried that current policies could undermine food production and place further strain on rural economies.
Mr Kurtz also raised concerns about long-term food security, saying farmers wanted stronger backing for domestic production and more confidence about the future.
He said: “Our farmers are the backbone of rural Wales. They produce our food, support local jobs and care for our countryside.
“But right now, too many feel that decisions by Labour, backed by Plaid Cymru and the Liberal Democrats, are being imposed on them rather than made with them.
“That has to change.”
The Welsh Conservatives say their proposals for the sector include an extra £100 million for the agriculture budget over the next Senedd term, placing food security and productivity at the heart of the Sustainable Farming Scheme, increasing the amount of Welsh food served in schools and hospitals, and moving away from an all-Wales NVZ policy in favour of a more targeted, catchment-based approach.
The party has also pledged to continue campaigning against the so-called family farm tax and to take stronger action on bovine TB in livestock and wildlife.
Mr Kurtz said: “We need a government that backs farmers, not one that creates barriers and uncertainty.
“We will continue to fight for a better deal for rural Wales and ensure that farmers’ voices are heard loud and clear.”
The hustings formed part of wider engagement with the agricultural sector during the election campaign, with farming remaining one of the key issues in rural parts of west Wales.
While Mr Kurtz used the event to attack Labour’s record in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, the discussion also reflected broader concern within the industry over funding, regulation and the future direction of farm policy in Wales.
Business
House plan for 25-acre Felindre Farchog farmland site
PLANS for a rural enterprise dwelling to support a Pembrokeshire horticultural business are being recommended for approval despite concerns from the local community council.
In an application recommended for approval at the April meeting of Pembrokeshire Coast National Park’s development management committee, Southern Roots Organics/Awen Organics, through agent Preseli Planning Ltd, seeks permission for a rural enterprise dwelling, track extension, and associated works at Eithin Farm, Felindre Farchog, near Nevern.
This application is being presented to the Development Management Committee as local community council Nevern has objected to the application raising material planning matters, contrary to the officer recommendation for approval.
An officer report says Eithin Farm comprises about 25 acres of agricultural land, with an additional seven acres to be rented by the applicants; the applicants running a horticultural business from the site, using multiple polytunnels and employing irrigation systems which require careful management.
The report says the business has been trading for over three years and can support a full-time worker, meeting criteria which addresses planning for sustainable rural communities. The proposal is said to meet these requirements, and the officer’s report confirms a genuine need for the dwelling.
Nevern, in its objection, said: “The living accommodation is supposed to be part of the business, it needs to be closer to the sheds, making the whole enterprise more aesthetically pleasing. The area designated for future seasonal agricultural workers would be an areas that would be more appropriate for a traditional cottage. A restriction on the house, a tied house needs to be considered.”
Objections to the plan have also been received from members of the public raising concerns including foul water disposal and the application “has nothing to do with the new current business”.
However, a number of representations have expressed support for the application. Issues raised include the benefit of applicants living on site, helping to reduce travel and carbon emissions, and confirming support for local, small-scale horticulture, and the contribution the business makes to the community.
The report says there is an identified need for a rural worker’s dwelling, especially due to the need to quickly respond to changes in crop conditions and potential failures in irrigation or ventilation systems.
It concludes: “The evidence submitted with this application, having been assessed by PCNPA’s Agricultural Advisors, is sufficient to demonstrate that an essential need exists for a rural enterprise dwelling, and that the proposal meets the tests set out in [policy].
“The siting and design of the dwelling are considered acceptable with no concerns in relation to landscape impact, amenity or biodiversity. Overall, the proposal is considered to be acceptable and a recommendation to grant permission is made.”
Farming
Pembrokeshire Mynachlogddu home’s 20 year planning breach
A CONDITION restricting a rural Pembrokeshire home to agricultural workers-only has been removed after its occupants lived in breach of that for some two decades.
In an application to Pembrokeshire Coast National Park, Richard Tadman and Rebecca Brinton, through agent Carver Knowles, sought a certificate of lawfulness for non-compliance of an agricultural/forestry occupancy condition for Brynmelyn, Mynachlogddu.
The condition restricting the occupancy was part of a consent for the farmhouse granted back in 1985.
An application for a certificate of lawfulness allows an applicant to stay at a development if they can provide proof of occupancy without any enforcement challenge over a prolonged period.
A supporting statement accompanying the application said evidence had been gathered to verify that since May 2006 the property has been occupied in breach of that condition, Ms Brinton purchasing the property that year, with Mr Tadman living there until 2022 and Ms Brinton continuing to do so.
When Mr Tadman was living at Brynmelyn he was self-employed as a mechanic, and Ms Brinton has not worked in agriculture or forestry, other than the couple keeping a few animals including chickens, ducks, turkeys, and pigs for a short period from 2008 until 2010 when the pigs had to be culled following a TB outbreak, the poultry succumbing to foxes.
The statement said council tax payment records to Pembrokeshire County Council showed the occupancy from 2006, adding that many of the previous owners apart from the original has not got an agricultural worker connection either,
An officer report recommending approval, which led to the issuing of a certificate of lawfulness, said: “The occupation of Brynmelyn of persons not employed in agriculture or forestry has been continuous for a period in excess of 10 years. It therefore represents a use unauthorised by the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
“The use of the dwelling exceeds the time limit for the Local Planning Authority to take any enforcement action, in accordance with Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) and / or the preceding Town and Country Planning Act 1971. This authority considers that a Lawful Development Certificate can be issued.”
-
Business5 days agoA proper Pembroke local: Inside the warm welcome of The Old Cross Saws Inn
-
Crime7 days agoOver 500 arrests at latest Palestine Action protest in London
-
Sport6 days agoGrand Slam win for Pembrokeshire rugby ace
-
Community5 days agoDoorstep warning issued after reports of suspicious callers in Pembrokeshire
-
Business3 days agoMilford Haven dry dock pitched as home for giant £480m superyacht yard
-
Crime5 days agoRomino’s licence revoked after illegal workers found and fire risks exposed
-
Politics4 days agoWelsh Lib Dems promise childcare boost, social care reform in manifesto launch
-
News7 days agoReform attacks Plaid on spending and immigration ahead of Senedd poll








