News
Pensioner cleared of sexual assault
A 78-YEAR-OLD man was found not guilty at Haverfordwest Magistrates Court on Wednesday of last week after being accused of sexual assault.
John Joseph Colfer, of Haven Court, Monkton, had been charged with sexual assault on a woman from Monkton on two separate occasions. The first was cuddling and kissing her on May 23, and the second was grabbing her while she was in a phone box on May 25.
The Herald cannot name the woman for legal reasons. Three 999 calls were played from the two incidents. During the calls, the alleged victim refused to give her name a number of times and mumbled considerably over the phone. She was very unclear about the reason she was calling and said: “I went to use his landline. I was on my own. I was being stupid” and later “I know you won’t do **** all about it because you don’t do **** all around here”. In the last call, we hear her say “I just want him to leave me alone” and “I hate him” while crying.
She claimed that she had gone to Colfer’s home address to use his telephone. She then gave her version of events: “I went to use his phone and he asked me to sit down. He sat next to me and put his arms around me and started kissing me. I didn’t want him to. I used to live next door to him. I went to get up to leave and he said ‘You only leave when I tell you to’. I was scared. After he went to do something with the dogs, I just got up and walked out of his front door”.
She then spoke about the second incident: “I was in the phone box and I didn’t know he was there until he put his arms around me and said we’ve got to finish what we started and called me a slut. I said I didn’t start nothing and he went home”.
Defence solicitor, Kate Smith said: “You have indicated that you have known Mr Colfer for a long time and brought your children up next door to him. I understand that you no longer have a relationship with your daughters. I imagine that much be very stressing and upsetting for you?”
The alleged victim confirmed this. Miss Smith continued: “I understand you attended at his address. He was the last link to your daughters, so is the reason you attended the house not to use the telephone, but to inquire about your daughters and you got upset?”
She denied this fact and said: “We were talking earlier and he said I’m welcome any time”.
Miss Smith asked the victim why she went to the house. She said: “I was invited. He said I could come over and chill out. I knew he had a landline and I wanted to use it”.
Miss Smith then said: “You’re lying, aren’t you? Mr Colfer doesn’t have a landline and you’re lying about the conversation. Your statement says ‘I went over to Shaun’s phone to call the police. I’d been having problems with kids. He said if I ever have any problems I can use the phone’. What I’m suggesting is you’re giving a different account in the court than you did to the officer. Why didn’t you tell the police what you told us?”
The alleged victim said: “After what happened I was really upset”.
Miss Smith replied: “How do you say that affected you? Did it affect your memory?”
She told the court: “I’ve got depression and health problems and I don’t need to sit here getting a mouthful from you”.
Miss Smith then asked the victim: “Can I suggest you’re giving an inconsistent account on what happened? Mr Colfer did not have a conversation with you”.
She replied: “He did because I was with my ex-partner. He went to Nottingham a couple of weeks ago”.
Miss Smith asked again: “You went to discuss your children” and was cut off by the alleged victim, who shouted “No, I don’t want nothing to do with my children”.
Miss Smith told her that she knew it was difficult for her. Her response was: “You know something, you’re doing my bloody head in! He told me he didn’t have a phone, I went to get up but I couldn’t and said you leave when I tell you to. Now can we leave it?”
Miss Smith said: “I’m afraid I can’t. Did you tell him why you were there or did you just go in?” After not receiving an answer, she continued: “I understood you came into the property, he told you he didn’t have a phone and then you sat down. You haven’t said why you’re there, and he didn’t ask?”
The victim denied this and Miss Smith continued: “Why didn’t you leave the house after he told you he didn’t have a phone?”. She replied saying: “I couldn’t get up”.
Miss Smith asked: “Why didn’t you inform the police about the conversation about the landline? The defendant told you he didn’t have one, why is it a matter you have failed to mention? My problem is, you’re telling the court one thing and your statement says another. Can you explain why you failed to mention the conversation about the landline?”
The alleged victim had no answer.
“On two occasions in your statement you asked to use the telephone. Why didn’t you include his response that he didn’t have a phone?”
This question was asked twice. The alleged victim failed to give an answer.
Miss Smith read her 999 call: “I went in to use his phone. He kissed me all over and said I’m the Monkton slut’. Why didn’t you tell 999 what happened?”
She replied: “I know what happened”.
Miss Smith said: “You have given different accounts. There is nothing in your statement about him calling you the Monkton slut. It’s inconsistent and isn’t in your statement because it didn’t happen. The defendant’s case is you came to speak about your children”.
The alleged victim screamed: “Leave my children out of this!”
Miss Smith continued saying: “He put his hands over your shoulder to comfort you,” and was cut off by the alleged victim shouting “He was putting his hand all over me”.
Miss Smith replied: “Was he? You’ve never said that before. You’ve previously said ‘he had his arms around me’. Where did he actually have his hands?”
Her reply was: “You’re female, you should know”.
There was a pause before Miss Smith continued: “’He had his arms around me and I couldn’t move’. Where on your body did he have his hands? This defendant has been charged with extremely serious offences and I need to establish exactly what happened. Had you been drinking May 23?”
The alleged victim denied this. Miss Smith asked: “Why were you refusing to give your name?”
Her reply was: “Because the coppers know me”.
Miss Smith said: “In the incident on May 25 you were on the phone and you had just put the receiver down, and you state ‘he was right behind me. He put his arms around my waist and said we’ve got to finish what we started’. You made no mention about the comments he made over the phone. Upon being asked by Miss Smith if she claims to have told Mr Colfer to ‘sod off’ with reference to the alleged incident on May 25, she said: “Yes. Any more language? Because I’ve got plenty” and later said “I am having enough of you!”
Prosecuting, David Weale read out Mr Colfer’s statement: “She came to my house about her children, and she was crying a lot saying she is not allowed to see her children. I put my arms around her and gave her a kiss on the lips and her cheek. It lit her up a bit. It put a smile back on her face. When a woman’s in distress you give them a cuddle, in a way she gave me permission. I couldn’t help her with her problem. She did not ask to use the landline, and she left around 10 or 15 minutes after the kiss. “I didn’t call her a slut. I saw her to the door and waved goodbye. I’m 78 years of age, I lost that long ago. In the second incident I didn’t see her that day. I got off the bus around 5pm and I walked past the phone box on the way home, and I did not see anyone.”
Miss Smith pointed out in her final submission that it is concerning that there were no other eye witnesses to back up her account of what happened May 25 and that her evidence falls short.
Magistrates found Mr Colfer not guilty, and told the court: “We do not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that a sexual assault took place on either occasion”.’
Business
Mounting complaints: More Computer Solutions Wales customers claim losses
Business owner issues legal threats and IPSO complaint to this newspaper while refusing to answer detailed questions about customers who say they were ‘ripped off’
MULTIPLE customers and former associates have come forward to The Pembrokeshire Herald alleging they were left out of pocket after dealings with Computer Solutions Wales, a business operated by Steven Grant.
Following our earlier reporting more people have come forward. The Herald has now spoken to a growing number of individuals who describe similar experiences involving upfront payments, missing equipment, delays, and difficulties obtaining refunds or wages.
The allegations span a period from 2024 into 2025 and involve sums ranging from hundreds to several thousand pounds.
Grant denies wrongdoing and has refused to provide detailed comment on specific allegations, instead issuing legal threats demanding the newspaper cease reporting on the matter.
The Herald investigation is continuing.
Customers describe similar experiences
While each case has its own circumstances, complainants who contacted the newspaper independently described recurring themes:
• Requests for payment upfront
• Delays or lack of communication
• Explanations involving disputes with landlords or access to premises
• Assurances that work had been completed or refunds issued
• Difficulty recovering money or property
The Herald has reviewed bank statements, payment confirmations, correspondence, and message exchanges relating to several of the complaints.
There is currently no finding of criminal liability, and disputes of this nature are typically matters for civil courts. However, the number of individuals reporting similar experiences has raised public-interest concerns.
NHS worker says she lost laptop and repair payment
One of the most recent complainants, Emma Venables, an NHS worker, says she paid £589 in October 2024 to have her son’s water-damaged laptop repaired.
Bank records seen by the Herald confirm a Faster Payment of £589 made on Friday (Oct 11, 2024) to Computer Solutions.
Ms Venables says communication became sporadic despite repeated attempts to contact the business.
Messages reviewed by the Herald show Grant stating the laptop had been repaired but was locked inside premises due to a dispute with a landlord.
Ms Venables later gained access to the premises through a letting agent but says the laptop was not present.
Grant allegedly suggested the device may have been taken by others with access to the building.
Despite later agreeing to refund the payment, Ms Venables says no money was returned and she has been left both without the device and out of pocket.
She told the Herald the situation caused significant distress during a period when she was grieving the death of her husband.

Animator claims nearly £3,000 loss
Cardiff-based animator Rebecca Merrell says she transferred £2,964.55 in December 2024 for a custom-built computer system which she says was never delivered.
Bank documentation supplied to the Herald confirms the transfer was made via Faster Payments to an account linked to Grant’s business.
Ms Merrell alleges she received repeated assurances the computer had been completed and would be delivered, including claims it was already in Grant’s vehicle awaiting transport.
She further alleges she was sent screenshots appearing to show a refund had been issued, but no payment was ever received.
The Herald has reviewed copies of documents she provided.
Ms Merrell says she was unable to work for months without a replacement computer and had to borrow money from family to purchase another system elsewhere.
She described the experience as having a serious impact on her confidence and mental wellbeing.
Another customer reports lost laptop and payment
The Herald has also spoken to another customer who says they lost both a laptop valued at approximately £1,500 and £589 paid for repairs after handing the device to the business.
They say they were later told the computer had been inside premises affected by a landlord dispute and could not be accessed.
No refund was received.
Further individuals have contacted the Herald describing disputes involving payments for goods or services they say were not delivered or completed.
These claims are currently being reviewed.

Former worker alleges unpaid wages
Separate to the customer complaints, the Herald has also been contacted by a former worker who claims they carried out work connected to the business but did not receive agreed payment.
Documentation relating to that claim has been shared with the newspaper.
The Herald understands the individual believes they are owed money and has considered pursuing recovery through civil action.
Grant has not provided a response to that allegation.
Timeline of disputes
Information provided to the Herald suggests the disputes span several months.
Some complainants describe making payments in late 2024 and experiencing ongoing communication issues into early 2025.
Others report refund promises that they say were not fulfilled.
The Herald is continuing to verify additional timelines as more individuals come forward.
Grant refuses detailed comment
The Herald contacted Steven Grant with detailed questions covering each allegation and the evidence provided by complainants.
He declined to respond to the specifics.
In correspondence, Grant said: “My mental health isn’t great.”
He also warned that further articles would result in legal action.
Legal threats issued to newspaper
Grant subsequently sent what he described as a “final and formal legal notice” to the Herald demanding:
• Immediate cessation of reporting
• Removal of published material
• A retraction
• Written confirmation within seven days
The Herald is continuing its reporting in the public interest.
Grant has also lodged a complaint with the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO).
Right to reply offered
Grant has been given multiple opportunities to respond to the allegations raised by customers and former associates before publication of this article.
He declined to provide any substantive comment.
Customers considering legal action
Some complainants say they are considering civil claims or seeking advice from Trading Standards.
Others say personal circumstances prevented them from pursuing action sooner.
Investigation continues
Since the Herald began reporting on Computer Solutions Wales, additional individuals have contacted the newspaper with further accounts.
Journalists are currently interviewing witnesses and reviewing documentation to establish whether those complaints can be reported on the record.
Anyone with relevant information is invited to contact the newsroom confidentially.
Health
Health board confirms major hospital changes across west Wales
Emergency surgery centralised as Withybush role shifts toward planned care
MAJOR changes to hospital services across west Wales have been approved following an extraordinary meeting of Hywel Dda University Health Board on Thursday (Feb 19).
Board members agreed the next steps in the organisation’s Clinical Services Plan, covering nine services identified as under pressure or “fragile”, including emergency general surgery, critical care, stroke and orthopaedics.
The decisions will see some specialist services concentrated on fewer hospital sites, alongside plans to expand planned care at Prince Philip Hospital in Llanelli and Withybush Hospital in Haverfordwest.
Health chiefs stressed that no immediate changes would take place, with implementation expected to happen gradually over several years.

Consultation and decision process
During summer 2025, the Health Board carried out a major public consultation involving more than 4,000 questionnaire responses and engagement events attended by over 4,000 people.
An independent report produced by Opinion Research Services summarised the feedback, while board members also considered workforce pressures, clinical standards, estate issues and financial factors.
Twenty-two alternative proposals submitted by the public were formally assessed against criteria including sustainability, accessibility and deliverability.
Emergency surgery changes
Under the plans, emergency general surgery operations will be concentrated at Glangwili Hospital in Carmarthen and Bronglais Hospital in Aberystwyth.
Patients from Pembrokeshire requiring surgery will be transferred to Glangwili when operative treatment is needed.
However, emergency departments will continue operating as normal at all four hospitals.

Other service changes
Across the region, the approved direction includes:
• Intensive care units remaining at Bronglais, Glangwili and Withybush, with Prince Philip Hospital providing enhanced care for less critically ill patients.
• Dermatology services primarily based at Prince Philip Hospital, supported by community clinics and telemedicine.
• Endoscopy procedures brought together at Prince Philip while retaining bowel screening across sites.
• Ophthalmology services concentrated mainly at Glangwili with community provision elsewhere.
• Orthopaedic surgery expanding at Withybush for less complex procedures.
• Radiology retaining emergency imaging at all hospitals with new diagnostic hubs planned.
• Urology inpatient care centralised at Prince Philip Hospital.
Stroke services remain under review, with further public engagement planned before final decisions.

Future role of hospitals
The Board confirmed the intended future roles of the four main hospitals:
• Bronglais Hospital — broad range of services.
• Glangwili Hospital — increasing focus on acute and emergency care.
• Prince Philip Hospital — expanding planned care role.
• Withybush Hospital — increased planned care activity while continuing initial emergency access.
Health leaders emphasised there would be no change to how patients access emergency departments or minor injury units.
Board leaders respond
Health Board Chair Dr Neil Wooding said the changes were necessary to secure services for the future.
“Our ambition is for people to live healthier lives for longer by supporting people to keep well and preventing ill health,” he said.
“These decisions are not easy, but as a Board we have a duty to ensure that our services provide the best outcomes for our patients and meet the highest standards.”
Lee Davies, Executive Director of Strategy and Planning, said most services now had a clear direction.
“Our priority is always to deliver the highest standards of care for our patients across Hywel Dda and neighbouring communities,” he said.
Next steps
Detailed implementation plans will now be developed, with further engagement expected in areas where decisions are not yet finalised, particularly stroke services.
Patients are being advised to continue attending appointments as normal while the changes are planned.
More information, including board papers and meeting recordings, is available via the Health Board website.
Community
Town council grant helps secure community arts activity in Milford Haven
MILFORD HAVEN’S Torch Theatre has been awarded a £7,500 grant by Milford Haven Town Council, continuing a long tradition of support for community arts at the iconic venue.
Established in 1977 with significant backing from the Town Council, the Torch Theatre remains one of only three building-based professional producing theatres in Wales. It is widely recognised for its in-house productions as well as its extensive youth and community programmes.
The theatre, which operates as a charity, receives public funding through the Arts Council of Wales and Pembrokeshire County Council, alongside support from local businesses and organisations including Milford Haven Port Authority. Leaders at the venue say funding remains essential to maintaining its broad programme of events and activities for the community.
Chelsey Gillard, Interim CEO and Artistic Director at the Torch Theatre, said: “Being awarded grants such as this one from the Town Council helps us to deliver quality arts to the people of Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire and further afield.
“We are very grateful for this continued support and appreciate the work of the Town Council to ensure important provision is supported across Milford.”
The Torch hosts more than 2,000 events and activities each year, attracting over 100,000 visitors. Its community facilities include The Junction, home to the Torch Youth Theatre and a rehearsal space for professional productions. The main auditorium seats 300 people, while the Studio Theatre accommodates 102. The Joanna Field Gallery showcases local exhibitions, and Café Torch serves meals throughout the year.
Ms Gillard added: “We do so much more than what audiences see on stage. Just to name a few of our regular activities, we run a very popular Youth Theatre for ages seven to eighteen, facilitate relaxed environment screenings and shows, host a Welsh learners’ group, Coffi Cymraeg, and hold regular clothes swaps.
“The Torch is also home to Welsh National Opera’s critically acclaimed Cradle Choir for people living with dementia and lots of high-quality classes for adults with disabilities run by Arts Care. All this activity relies on our team of brilliant volunteers and support from grants, trusts and donations.
“This grant will go towards ensuring these activities can continue — thank you.”
-
Business2 days agoMS’s host business advice surgery following demand from Business Rates Online Forum
-
Crime6 days agoFour arrested in armed police operation across Pembroke Dock
-
Health6 hours agoWithybush loses emergency surgery in shock health board decision
-
Community4 days agoHywel Dda hospital services decisions will be made next week
-
Education6 days agoSchool in special measures after inspectors raise safeguarding and leadership concerns
-
Community5 days agoSecond Milford Haven webcam launched after 1.3m views and US TV feature
-
Farming6 days agoHousing restriction at Hayscastle farm site removed
-
Business3 days agoSvitzer crews at Milford Haven vote for industrial action in pay dispute










