Defendant given a suspended prison sentence after magistrates heard the offence was serious enough to cross the custody threshold

KRISTIAN DAVIES, aged 35, of Rock Cottages, Neyland, pleaded guilty at Llanelli Magistrates’ Court to aggravated vehicle taking.

The court heard that on January 26, 2026, at Narberth, Davies took a Ford Focus without the consent of the owner or other lawful authority. The vehicle was damaged before it was recovered, with the damage assessed at less than £5,000.

Magistrates sentenced Davies on Tuesday (Mar 31) to 18 weeks’ imprisonment, suspended for 18 months.

The bench said the offence was so serious that only a custodial sentence could be justified, citing Davies’ relevant previous convictions and the fact he was already subject to a court order at the time, which he is now in breach of.

However, the prison term was suspended because the court found there were real prospects of rehabilitation in the community.

Davies was also made subject to an 18-month supervision requirement, a non-residential drug rehabilitation requirement with reviews, and up to 15 days of rehabilitation activity.

As part of the order, he must engage with Dyfed Drug and Alcohol Service and provide samples for a 12-month period.

He was also banned from driving for 24 months.

The first review hearing is due to take place at Haverfordwest Magistrates’ Court on April 27 at 10:00am. Bail conditions were cancelled as a matter of urgency.

A HAVERFORDWEST teaching assistant became the quiet centrepiece of Welsh Labour’s manifesto launch — and, in doing so, revealed a party focused less on momentum than on damage limitation in towns like ours.

Eluned Morgan’s manifesto launch speech was meant to speak to the whole of Wales. But tucked inside it was a telling local calculation.

When the Welsh Labour leader told delegates about a teaching assistant in Haverfordwest who had “never voted in her life” but would now back Labour because of a pay rise, it was no throwaway line.

It was one of the clearest signs yet of where Labour believes this election may be won or lost.

After years in power, Welsh Labour knows it cannot simply rely on habit, loyalty or anti-Tory feeling to carry it over the line. It needs to reconnect with lower-paid working people in towns like Haverfordwest — voters who may still support parts of Labour’s record, but are increasingly doubtful that life in Wales is getting better.

That is why Morgan’s speech mattered.

Far from sounding like a leader marching confidently towards victory, she sounded like someone trying to hold together a delicate coalition of public sector workers, traditional Labour supporters and anxious voters tempted by change, but wary of the alternatives.

The tone was revealing from the outset.

This was not a speech built on triumph. It was built on caution.

Morgan spoke of pressure on families, pressure on public services and pressure on her own party. She acknowledged that many voters feel something “isn’t quite right” and said people want “a little more certainty” and “a little less dread”.

That is not the language of a party taking victory for granted. It is the language of a party that knows it must steady nervous voters before polling day.

In that sense, the Haverfordwest example was politically shrewd.

Teaching assistants and school support staff are not just another part of the workforce. They are exactly the sort of voters Labour needs to keep onside — public-facing, often modestly paid, rooted in their communities and living the everyday pressures politicians talk about so freely.

By highlighting a Haverfordwest worker who had never voted before, Morgan was trying to tell a wider story: that Welsh Labour can still reach the ordinary voter who feels overlooked, underpaid and unconvinced by politics in general.

But there was another message buried in the anecdote.

Labour is plainly worried about disengagement.

A voter who has “never voted in her life” is useful in a speech not just because she is newly supportive, but because she represents a wider problem for all parties — the sense that many people have drifted away from politics altogether.

Morgan knows frustration with government in Cardiff Bay is real, especially after long-running complaints over NHS access, stretched public services, transport and the cost of living. Her answer was not to offer excitement, but reassurance.

That came through again and again.

She promised there would be no rise in income tax. She attacked “easy promises” and “slogans”. She said she would not “gamble” with people’s lives. She framed the election not as a call for upheaval, but as a choice between seriousness and protest.

In plain terms, Labour is trying to turn this election into a referendum on risk.

That is often what governing parties do when they sense frustration in the electorate, but hope voters remain more cautious about the opposition.

It also helps explain why west Wales featured so prominently in the speech.

Morgan promised a new hospital for west Wales as part of a wider NHS building programme. She also pledged that patients would be able to access a primary healthcare professional within 48 hours if they had a problem that could not wait.

Those lines will have landed strongly in Pembrokeshire, where concern over health services has become one of the most potent and emotional issues in local politics.

But they also expose Labour’s weakness.

After decades as the dominant force in Welsh politics, Labour is still having to promise basic improvements in areas where public frustration is already deepest. Voters may welcome those pledges, but many will also ask why, after all this time, they are still being asked to wait.

That is the central tension in Morgan’s speech.

She wants to campaign as both the agent of improvement and the guardian of stability. She is asking people to believe Labour can fix problems that have grown on Labour’s watch, while also arguing that nobody else can be trusted to take over.

It is not an impossible argument. But it is a difficult one.

For readers in Pembrokeshire, perhaps the most revealing thing about the speech is not just what it promised, but what it exposed.

It exposed a Welsh Labour leadership that knows west Wales matters.

It exposed a party that sees lower-paid workers and public service staff as central to its survival.

And it exposed a leader who understands that this election is not being fought on favourable ground.

The repeated slogan was “fairness you can feel”.

But the speech itself suggested something more hard-headed than hopeful.

Welsh Labour is no longer campaigning like a movement expecting gratitude. It is campaigning like a government asking voters, however frustrated they may be, not to take a chance on anything else.

Founder of the Grumpy Dumpty Foundation says clearer labelling and an opt-out from alcohol advertising could help people protect their recovery

A WELSH mental health and addiction campaigner has launched two parliamentary petitions aimed at helping people in recovery avoid unexpected alcohol exposure and relentless online triggers.

Gareth Clement, founder of the Grumpy Dumpty Foundation, said the proposals come directly from his own lived experience of addiction, recovery and mental health struggle. He described himself as a father of three who is now nearly four years sober after battling alcoholism and surviving a suicide attempt.

The first petition calls for all food containing alcohol to be clearly labelled. Clement says cooking does not always remove all alcohol and argues that even trace exposure can be distressing for some people in recovery.

The second petition calls for retailers, advertisers and digital platforms to provide an opt-out from online alcohol advertising and alcohol product visibility, including on shopping and delivery apps.

Clement said the campaign is not about restricting other people’s choices, but about giving those in recovery more control over what they are exposed to.

He said hidden alcohol in food and the constant visibility of alcohol products online can be deeply unhelpful for people trying to rebuild their lives.

For many people, recovery is not simply about avoiding a drink. It can also mean managing triggers, cravings and distress in everyday situations that others may barely notice.

The petitions are still in their early stages, but Clement hopes they will start a wider conversation about how addiction is understood and how people in recovery are supported.

His wider work through the Grumpy Dumpty Foundation focuses on breaking stigma, encouraging openness and offering support rooted in lived experience.

Whether either proposal gains political backing remains to be seen, but the campaign raises questions that are likely to resonate with many families in Wales affected by alcohol harm, addiction and poor mental health.

At the very least, Clement believes people in recovery deserve clearer information, fewer unnecessary triggers and a fairer chance of staying well.