Farming
Clear labelling ‘essential’, says Europe

Country of origin: Meat labelling wins vote.
NFU CYMRU has welcomed the news that the resolution on country of origin labelling for meat in processed food has been passed in the European Parliament. Lyndon Edwards, Chairman of NFU Cymru’s Livestock Board said: “In the past progress has been made on clearer labelling of fresh meat but less so on processed foods. Across Europe it is estimated that some 30% to 50% of the total slaughtered meat volume is processed into meat ingredients for foodstuffs, mostly into minced meat, meat preparations and meat products. Therefore, clear labelling of these processed foods is essential to let the consumers know not only what they are buying but where the ingredients actually originate from in the first place. “Like the proposals in the resolution we believe that labelling the origin of meat used as an ingredient in foods will help ensure better traceability along the food supply chain, more stable relationships between meat suppliers and processors and increased diligence when food business operators choose their suppliers and products. “We also agree that food labelling should take account of the transparency of the information and its readability for consumers, while enabling European businesses to operate in an economically viable manner and in conditions acceptable to the consumer’s purchasing power. “Legislative proposals, making the indication of the origin of meat in processed foods mandatory, will help ensure greater transparency throughout the food chain and better inform European consumers. Our own PGI status for Welsh Beef and Lamb are excellent examples of total traceability and quality of products.” He continued: “One word of caution however is avoiding excessive costs and administrative burdens on food processors as this could be ultimately passed down the line to primary producers. “We therefore fully agree with European Parliament to urge the European Commission to adopt an implementing act concerning the application of Article 2, of the Food Information to Consumers Regulation, which relates to the indication of the country of origin of primary ingredients where this is not the same as that of the food product. “Finally we ask our own Governments in Cardiff and Westminster to put pressure on the European Commission to ensure that the resolution passed in the European Parliament does result in the necessary legislation being implemented to help consumers make informed decisions on the food they buy.”
.
Community
Cosheston gypsy traveller 60 foot shed plans refused
A CALL for a 60-foot-long shed and stables at the proposed home of a gypsy traveller family near a Pembrokeshire village has been refused by planners.
In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Ryan Surname Boswell & Family, through agent Hayston Developments & Planning Ltd, sought provision for an access road and replacement of temporary stables and storage containers with a multi-purpose shed and stables at Greenwells, Cosheston Bridge, Cosheston.
The application initially sought a 24.3 by 9.1 metre building, which has now been reduced to 18.3m by nine.
A supporting statement said that land to the north “is subject to a current planning application for the provision of two traveller family pitches with improvements to access and ecological enhancements with other land in our client’s ownership being un-affected”.
It added: “Mr Boswell and his family are of traveller origin and intend to make this site their family home. They own various domestic equipment, children / family articles, mowers / tools and farming equipment that require secure storage. The shed will also be used to house horses/ponies that are currently stabled in the temporary wooden stable block currently on skids on the land in question.”
It concluded: “The scale, design and use of materials (and colours) of the proposed shed is comparable to many new such sheds throughout Pembrokeshire. There will be no significant negative impacts on the level of amenity enjoyed by any neighbours or those travelling along the minor county road to Cosheston from any aspects of the proposed development.”

Local community council Cosheston had raised concerns including the “excessive” size of the proposed building, feeling “this is on the large side of what is required for a couple of ponies”.
It added: “Our concern is that the applicant intends to run his building/property maintenance business from the property. If the council grants the application, restrictions should made on the property’s use. i.e. restricted to agricultural use only.
“We have no objection to the construction of a small stable block, similar in size to the existing one on site.”
Objections were also received from two members of the public, raising concerns including the scale, environmental concerns, and a potential conflict with the ongoing application.
An officer report recommending refusal said the scheme was part-retrospective due to the prior formation of an access track within the field.
It added: “Despite amendments to the application as originally submitted by the reduction in building footprint and scale, the proposal remains a substantial and visually intrusive structure in the open countryside. An essential countryside need has not been justified nor evidence provided of an agricultural or equine enterprise warranting a building of this size or permanence.”
The application was refused on the grounds it “is not typical of a structure intended solely for the storage of paraphernalia associated with grazing land or for equine use and no information has been provided within the application to demonstrate the functional need for a building of this scale”.
It added: “The nature, siting and scale of the building would not be compatible with the capacity and rural character of the site, and together with the access track results in an unjustified and visually intrusive form of development in the open countryside, which does not represent sustainable development.”
Farming
Agrisgôp helps Welsh farming families tackle succession challenges
A PROGRAMME designed to support farming families in planning for the future is helping to break down one of agriculture’s most sensitive issues – succession.
Farm inheritance and succession planning returned to the spotlight in 2024 following UK Government reforms to inheritance tax (IHT), prompting renewed concern across the industry.
In response, Agrisgôp leader Elaine Rees Jones brought together farming families in the Welshpool area to take part in a structured programme aimed at addressing the issue head-on.
Agrisgôp, a fully funded management development initiative, encourages farmers to work collaboratively, building confidence and business skills through action learning.
Two distinct groups emerged: one made up of parents seeking to plan the future of their farms, and another of younger family members exploring how to take on responsibility and transfer knowledge from the previous generation.
A key theme identified early on was the importance of communication between generations.
Elaine said: “The meetings have offered the opportunity to gain professional and peer advice, time away from the farm to assess situations, and a safe, confidential space for discussion.
“Group members have shared concerns and apprehensions while getting to grips with the scale of the challenge, and have begun to develop action plans.
“The honesty and openness shown has been incredibly humbling.”
For many participants, the programme has provided the confidence to begin formal discussions with professional advisers.
One farming couple, currently working through the process of passing assets to their two sons, said the experience had been invaluable.
“It has made us tackle things properly. We had already started looking at succession before the Rachel Reeves budget, so this wasn’t a knee-jerk reaction.
“It’s a complicated process with no easy answers, and every farm is different. But Agrisgôp has helped us go into meetings with solicitors and accountants informed, rather than just accepting advice blindly.”
Another participant described succession planning as “mind-blowing” before joining the group, adding that expert input had highlighted the importance of early preparation.
The programme included a recent panel session in Welshpool, where professionals returned to answer questions from participants, alongside one-to-one sessions to clarify individual plans.
Specialist advice was provided on legal, financial, and land valuation matters, with a clear message emerging on the importance of having a valid will in place.
Angharad Hird, of Lanyon Bowdler Solicitors, warned that failing to make a will can have serious consequences, highlighting a case where a young farmer died unexpectedly. Under intestacy rules, his estate was divided between his wife and children in a way that may not have reflected the family’s wishes.
Financial planning was also a major focus. From April 2027, unused pension funds will be included within estates for IHT purposes, potentially attracting tax of up to 40%.
Emma Hall, a chartered financial planner, said some clients are already restructuring their finances to mitigate future liabilities, including placing assets into trusts or converting pension funds into income-generating annuities.
Land and property valuation was another key consideration. Richard Corbett, of Roger Parry & Partners, stressed that valuations must reflect current market conditions at the time of assessment, while also taking into account factors such as shared ownership or rights of way.
Accountant Sion Roberts highlighted the importance of setting emotion aside when making decisions.
“There is no one-size-fits-all solution,” he said. “Each farm is different, so it’s vital to understand your priorities and get the right advice.”
The issue of care fees and asset transfers was also raised, with warnings about the risks of deliberately reducing assets to avoid future costs.
Alongside Agrisgôp, Farming Connect’s Succession Pathway offers structured support for families navigating the process. This includes business reviews, facilitated family meetings, bespoke planning, and access to specialist legal services.
Organisers say early planning is crucial to securing both family relationships and the long-term future of farm businesses.
Farmers interested in accessing support can contact Farming Connect on 03456 000 813 or visit their website for further information.
Business
Call to keep holiday pod at Pembrokeshire Narberth farm
A CALL to keep a holiday pod sited on a Pembrokeshire farm, as part of a wider holiday pod farm diversification over two areas which saw the larger part supported, has been submitted to county planners.
In an application to Pembrokeshire County Council, Bill Ridge of Vaynor Farm Ltd, Bethesda, through agent Gerald Blain Associates Limited, seeks retrospective permission to keep a self-catering pod at Broomley Farm, Sodston, Narberth, works having been completed in 2022.
The application is part of a wider scheme of holiday pods diversification encompassing two farms.
Back in December, Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning committee granted delegated retrospective permission to Vaynor Farm Ltd for the siting of two self-catering holiday accommodation pods at The Cart House, Vaynor Farm, Bethesda, near Narberth as part of a farm diversification enterprise.
A supporting statement accompanying the latest application says: “Vaynor farm is a 400-acre working dairy farm with a herd of 700 milking cows. The enterprise comprises of three self-catering pods. Two of the pods are situated at the Vaynor homestead and another at the opposite end of the holding at Broomley farm.
“The first unit was sited adjacent to Vaynor farm stead some four years ago and a further two added in subsequent years. The units have enjoyed successful occupancy rates over several years offering a unique secluded tourism offer on a working dairy farm, more detail of which is outlined within the supporting business plan.”
It says the Broomley farm application is a resubmission of a previously refused scheme, adding: “It should be noted that this application was originally part of [the application] which was recommended approval at planning committee in December 2025. This element however was separated due to its location on another part of Vaynor farm deeming it not possible to be considered under the same application.”
At the December meeting, an officer report said: “A business plan has been submitted with [that] application, which explains that due to uncertainties associated with dairy farming, the applicant has sought to diversify the farm enterprise to incorporate tourism accommodation.
“The application makes the case that the proposed development represents farm diversification. It is acknowledged that the development has resulted in the provision of an alternative type of holiday accommodation for which it has been demonstrated there is a demand, contributing to the diversity and quality of accommodation available within the county and supporting an existing farm business, with consequent economic and social benefits.
“Evidence has been provided that demonstrates the extent to which the pods have provided income which has been used to support the farm business.”
That application was conditionally approved; the latest part to be considered by planners at a later date.
-
News4 days agoAccommodation providers in Wales will be required to register under new law
-
Business6 days agoFishguard to Wexford rail tunnel plan backed by Elon Musk firm
-
Entertainment4 days agoFrom Milford Haven to the world: The story of The Evolution Experience
-
Entertainment5 days agoBBC unveils major new Welsh dramas with Tenby set for prime-time spotlight
-
Crime7 days agoDriver trapped after crash while nearly four times over drink-drive limit
-
Business7 days agoRefusal over Pembrokeshire shepherd hut let goes to appeal
-
Community5 days agoSycamore Gap legacy takes root at Carew Castle
-
Business5 days agoFire damaged Newgale Duke of Edinburgh Inn plans refused










